# Frequently Asked Questions

## [Beacon Node](#beacon-node-1)

- [I see beacon logs showing `WARN: Execution engine called failed`, what should I do?](#bn-ee)
- [I see beacon logs showing `Error during execution engine upcheck`, what should I do?](#bn-upcheck)
- [My beacon node is stuck at downloading historical block using checkpoint sync. What should I do?](#bn-download-historical)
- [I proposed a block but the beacon node shows `could not publish message` with error `duplicate` as below, should I be worried?](#bn-duplicate)
- [I see beacon node logs `Head is optimistic` and I am missing attestations. What should I do?](#bn-optimistic)
- [My beacon node logs `WARN BlockProcessingFailure outcome: MissingBeaconBlock`, what should I do?](#bn-missing-beacon)
- [After checkpoint sync, the progress of `downloading historical blocks` is slow. Why?](#bn-download-slow)
- [My beacon node logs `WARN Error processing HTTP API request`, what should I do?](#bn-http)
- [My beacon node logs `WARN Error signalling fork choice waiter`, what should I do?](#bn-fork-choice)
- [My beacon node logs `ERRO Aggregate attestation queue full`, what should I do?](#bn-queue-full)
- [My beacon node logs `WARN Failed to finalize deposit cache`, what should I do?](#bn-deposit-cache)
- [How can I construct only partial state history?](#bn-partial-history)

## [Validator](#validator-1)

- [Can I use redundancy in my staking setup?](#vc-redundancy)
- [I am missing attestations. Why?](#vc-missed-attestations)
- [Sometimes I miss the attestation head vote, resulting in penalty. Is this normal?](#vc-head-vote)
- [Can I submit a voluntary exit message without a beacon node?](#vc-exit)
- [Does increasing the number of validators increase the CPU and other computer resources used?](#vc-resource)
- [I want to add new validators. Do I have to reimport the existing keys?](#vc-reimport)
- [Do I have to stop `lighthouse vc` the when importing new validator keys?](#vc-import)
- [How can I delete my validator once it is imported?](#vc-delete)

## [Network, Monitoring and Maintenance](#network-monitoring-and-maintenance-1)

- [I have a low peer count and it is not increasing](#net-peer)
- [How do I update lighthouse?](#net-update)
- [Do I need to set up any port mappings (port forwarding)?](#net-port-forwarding)
- [How can I monitor my validators?](#net-monitor)
- [My beacon node and validator client are on different servers. How can I point the validator client to the beacon node?](#net-bn-vc)
- [Should I do anything to the beacon node or validator client settings if I have a relocation of the node / change of IP address?](#net-ip)
- [How to change the TCP/UDP port 9000 that Lighthouse listens on?](#net-port)
- [Lighthouse `v4.3.0` introduces a change where a node will subscribe to only 2 subnets in total. I am worried that this will impact my validators return.](#net-subnet)
- [How to know how many of my peers are connected through QUIC?](#net-quic)

## [Miscellaneous](#miscellaneous-1)

- [What should I do if I lose my slashing protection database?](#misc-slashing)
- [I can't compile lighthouse](#misc-compile)
- [How do I check the version of Lighthouse that is running?](#misc-version)
- [Does Lighthouse have pruning function like the execution client to save disk space?](#misc-prune)
- [Can I use a HDD for the freezer database and only have the hot db on SSD?](#misc-freezer)
- [Can Lighthouse log in local timestamp instead of UTC?](#misc-timestamp)
- [My hard disk is full and my validator is down. What should I do?](#misc-full)

## Beacon Node

### <a name="bn-ee"></a> I see beacon logs showing `WARN: Execution engine called failed`, what should I do?

The `WARN Execution engine called failed` log is shown when the beacon node cannot reach the execution engine. When this warning occurs, it will be followed by a detailed message. A frequently encountered example of the error message is:

`error: HttpClient(url: http://127.0.0.1:8551/, kind: timeout, detail: operation timed out), service: exec`

which says `TimedOut` at the end of the message. This means that the execution engine has not responded in time to the beacon node. One option is to add the flag `--execution-timeout-multiplier 3` to the beacon node. However, if the error persists, it is worth digging further to find out the cause. There are a few reasons why this can occur:

1. The execution engine is not synced. Check the log of the execution engine to make sure that it is synced. If it is syncing, wait until it is synced and the error will disappear. You will see the beacon node logs `INFO Execution engine online` when it is synced.
1. The computer is overloaded. Check the CPU and RAM usage to see if it has overloaded. You can use `htop` to check for CPU and RAM usage.
1. Your SSD is slow. Check if your SSD is in "The Bad" list [here](https://gist.github.com/yorickdowne/f3a3e79a573bf35767cd002cc977b038). If your SSD is in "The Bad" list, it means it cannot keep in sync to the network and you may want to consider upgrading to a better SSD.

If the reason for the error message is caused by no. 1 above, you may want to look further. If the execution engine is out of sync suddenly, it is usually caused by ungraceful shutdown. The common causes for ungraceful shutdown are:

- Power outage. If power outages are an issue at your place, consider getting a UPS to avoid ungraceful shutdown of services.
- The service file is not stopped properly. To overcome this, make sure that the process is stopped properly, e.g., during client updates.
- Out of memory (oom) error. This can happen when the system memory usage has reached its maximum and causes the execution engine to be killed. To confirm that the error is due to oom, run `sudo dmesg -T | grep killed` to look for killed processes. If you are using Geth as the execution client, a short term solution is to reduce the resources used. For example, you can reduce the cache by adding the flag `--cache 2048`. If the oom occurs rather frequently, a long term solution is to increase the memory capacity of the computer.

### <a name="bn-upcheck"></a> I see beacon logs showing `Error during execution engine upcheck`, what should I do?

An example of the full error is:

`ERRO Error during execution engine upcheck   error: HttpClient(url: http://127.0.0.1:8551/, kind: request, detail: error trying to connect: tcp connect error: Connection refused (os error 111)), service: exec`

Connection refused means the beacon node cannot reach the execution client. This could be due to the execution client is offline or the configuration is wrong. If the execution client is offline, run the execution engine and the error will disappear.

If it is a configuration issue, ensure that the execution engine can be reached. The standard endpoint to connect to the execution client is `--execution-endpoint http://localhost:8551`. If the execution client is on a different host, the endpoint to connect to it will change, e.g., `--execution-endpoint http://IP_address:8551` where `IP_address` is the IP of the execution client node (you may also need additional flags to be set). If it is using another port, the endpoint link needs to be changed accordingly. Once the execution client/beacon node is configured correctly, the error will disappear.

### <a name="bn-download-historical"></a> My beacon node is stuck at downloading historical block using checkpoint sync. What should I do?

After checkpoint forwards sync completes, the beacon node will start to download historical blocks. The log will look like:

```bash
INFO Downloading historical blocks           est_time: --, distance: 4524545 slots (89 weeks 5 days), service: slot_notifier
```

If the same log appears every minute and you do not see progress in downloading historical blocks, check the number of peers you are connected to. If you have low peers (less than 50), try to do port forwarding on the ports 9000 TCP/UDP and 9001 UDP to increase peer count.

### <a name="bn-duplicate"></a> I proposed a block but the beacon node shows `could not publish message` with error `duplicate` as below, should I be worried?

```text
INFO Block from HTTP API already known`
WARN Could not publish message error: Duplicate, service: libp2p
```

This error usually happens when users are running mev-boost. The relay will publish the block on the network before returning it back to you. After the relay published the block on the network, it will propagate through nodes, and it happens quite often that your node will receive the block from your connected peers via gossip first, before getting the block from the relay, hence the message `duplicate`.

In short, it is nothing to worry about.

### <a name="bn-optimistic"></a> I see beacon node logs `Head is optimistic`, and I am missing attestations. What should I do?

The log looks like:

```text
WARN Head is optimistic       execution_block_hash: 0x47e7555f1d4215d1ad409b1ac188b008fcb286ed8f38d3a5e8078a0af6cbd6e1, info: chain not fully verified, block and attestation production disabled until execution engine syncs, service: slot_notifier
```

It means the beacon node will follow the chain, but it will not be able to attest or produce blocks. This is because the execution client is not synced, so the beacon chain cannot verify the authenticity of the chain head, hence the word `optimistic`. What you need to do is to make sure that the execution client is up and syncing. Once the execution client is synced, the error will disappear.

### <a name="bn-missing-beacon"></a> My beacon node logs `WARN BlockProcessingFailure outcome: MissingBeaconBlock`, what should I do?

An example of the full log is shown below:

```text
WARN BlockProcessingFailure                  outcome: MissingBeaconBlock(0xbdba211f8d72029554e405d8e4906690dca807d1d7b1bc8c9b88d7970f1648bc), msg: unexpected condition in processing block.
```

`MissingBeaconBlock` suggests that the database has corrupted. You should wipe the database and use [Checkpoint Sync](./advanced_checkpoint_sync.md) to resync the beacon chain.

### <a name="bn-download-slow"></a> After checkpoint sync, the progress of `downloading historical blocks` is slow. Why?

This is a normal behaviour. Since [v4.1.0](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/releases/tag/v4.1.0), Lighthouse implements rate-limited backfill sync to mitigate validator performance issues after a checkpoint sync. This is not something to worry about since backfill sync / historical data is not required for staking. However, if you opt to sync the chain as fast as possible, you can add the flag `--disable-backfill-rate-limiting` to the beacon node.

### <a name="bn-http"></a> My beacon node logs `WARN Error processing HTTP API request`, what should I do?

An example of the log is shown below

```text
WARN Error processing HTTP API request       method: GET, path: /eth/v1/validator/attestation_data, status: 500 Internal Server Error, elapsed: 305.65µs
```

This warning usually happens when the validator client sends a request to the beacon node, but the beacon node is unable to fulfil the request. This can be due to the execution client is not synced/is syncing and/or the beacon node is syncing. The error show go away when the node is synced.

### <a name="bn-fork-choice"></a> My beacon node logs `WARN Error signalling fork choice waiter`, what should I do?

An example of the full log is shown below:

```text
WARN Error signalling fork choice waiter slot: 6763073, error: ForkChoiceSignalOutOfOrder { current: Slot(6763074), latest: Slot(6763073) }, service: state_advance
```

This suggests that the computer resources are being overwhelmed. It could be due to high CPU usage or high disk I/O usage. This can happen, e.g., when the beacon node is downloading historical blocks, or when the execution client is syncing. The error will disappear when the resources used return to normal or when the node is synced.

### <a name="bn-queue-full"></a> My beacon node logs `ERRO Aggregate attestation queue full`, what should I do?

Some examples of the full log is shown below:

```text
ERRO Aggregate attestation queue full, queue_len: 4096, msg: the system has insufficient resources for load, module: network::beacon_processor:1542
ERRO Attestation delay queue is full         msg: system resources may be saturated, queue_size: 16384, service: bproc
```

This suggests that the computer resources are being overwhelmed. It could be due to high CPU usage or high disk I/O usage. Some common reasons are:

- when the beacon node is downloading historical blocks
- the execution client is syncing
- disk IO is being overwhelmed
- parallel API queries to the beacon node

If the node is syncing or downloading historical blocks, the error should disappear when the resources used return to normal or when the node is synced.

### <a name="bn-deposit-cache"></a> My beacon node logs `WARN Failed to finalize deposit cache`, what should I do?

This is a known [bug](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3707) that will fix by itself.

### <a name="bn-partial-history"></a> How can I construct only partial state history?

Lighthouse prunes finalized states by default. Nevertheless, it is quite often that users may be interested in the state history of a few epochs before finalization. To have access to these pruned states, Lighthouse typically requires a full reconstruction of states using the flag `--archive` (which will usually take a week). Partial state history can be achieved with some "tricks". Here are the general steps:

  1. Delete the current database. You can do so with `--purge-db-force` or manually deleting the database from the data directory: `$datadir/beacon`.

  1. If you are interested in the states from the current slot and beyond, perform a checkpoint sync with the flag `--archive`, then you can skip the following and jump straight to Step 5 to check the database.

      If you are interested in the states before the current slot, identify the slot to perform a manual checkpoint sync. With the default configuration, this slot should be divisible by 2<sup>21</sup>, as this is where a full state snapshot is stored. With the flag `--archive`, the state upper limit will be adjusted to the next full snapshot slot, a slot that satisfies: `slot % 2**21 == 0`. In other words, to have the state history available before the current slot, we have to checkpoint sync 2<sup>21</sup> slots before the next full snapshot slot.

      Example: Say the current mainnet is at slot `12000000`. As the next full state snapshot is at slot `12582912`, the slot that we want is slot `10485760`. You can calculate this (in Python) using `12000000 // 2**21 * 2**21`.

  1. [Export](./advanced_checkpoint_sync.md#manual-checkpoint-sync) the blobs, block and state data for the slot identified in Step 2. This can be done from another beacon node that you have access to, or you could use any available public beacon API, e.g., [QuickNode](https://www.quicknode.com/docs/ethereum).

  1. Perform a [manual checkpoint sync](./advanced_checkpoint_sync.md#manual-checkpoint-sync) using the data from the previous step, and provide the flag `--archive`.

  1. Check the database:

  ```bash
  curl "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/database/info" | jq '.anchor'
  ```

  and look for the field `state_upper_limit`. It should show the slot of the snapshot:

  ```json
  "state_upper_limit": "10485760",
  ```

Lighthouse will now start to reconstruct historic states from slot `10485760`. At this point, if you do not want a full state reconstruction, you may remove the flag `--archive` (and restart). When the process is completed, you will have the state data from slot `10485760`. Going forward, Lighthouse will continue retaining all historical states newer than the snapshot. Eventually this can lead to increased disk usage, which presently can only be reduced by repeating the process starting from a more recent snapshot.

> Note: You may only be interested in very recent historic states. To do so, you may configure the full snapshot to be, for example, every 2<sup>11</sup> slots, see [database configuration](./advanced_database.md#hierarchical-state-diffs) for more details. This can be configured with the flag `--hierarchy-exponents 5,7,11` together with the flag `--archive`. This will affect the slot number in Step 2, while other steps remain the same. Note that this comes at the expense of a higher storage requirement.

> With `--hierarchy-exponents 5,7,11`, using the same example as above, the next full state snapshot is at slot `12001280`. So the slot to checkpoint sync from is: slot `11999232`.

## Validator

### <a name="vc-redundancy"></a> Can I use redundancy in my staking setup?

You should **never** use duplicate/redundant validator keypairs or validator clients (i.e., don't
duplicate your JSON keystores and don't run `lighthouse vc` twice). This will lead to slashing.

However, there are some components which can be configured with redundancy. See the
[Redundancy](./advanced_redundancy.md) guide for more information.

### <a name="vc-missed-attestations"></a> I am missing attestations. Why?

The first thing is to ensure both consensus and execution clients are synced with the network. If they are synced, there may still be some issues with the node setup itself that is causing the missed attestations. Check the setup to ensure that:

- the clock is synced
- the computer has sufficient resources and is not overloaded
- the internet is working well
- you have sufficient peers

You can see more information on the [EthStaker KB](https://ethstaker.gitbook.io/ethstaker-knowledge-base/help/missed-attestations).

Another cause for missing attestations is the block arriving late, or there are delays during block processing.

An example of the log: (debug logs can be found under `$datadir/beacon/logs`):

```text
DEBG Delayed head block, set_as_head_time_ms: 37, imported_time_ms: 1824, attestable_delay_ms: 3660, available_delay_ms: 3491, execution_time_ms: 78, consensus_time_ms: 161, blob_delay_ms: 3291, observed_delay_ms: 3250, total_delay_ms: 5352, slot: 11429888, proposer_index: 778696, block_root: 0x34cc0675ad5fd052699af2ff37b858c3eb8186c5b29fdadb1dabd246caf79e43, service: beacon, module: beacon_chain::canonical_head:1440
```

The field to look for is `attestable_delay`, which defines the time when a block is ready for the validator to attest. If the `attestable_delay` is greater than 4s then it has missed the window for attestation, and the attestation will fail. In the above example, the delay is mostly caused by a late block observed by the node, as shown in `observed_delay`. The `observed_delay` is determined mostly by the proposer and partly by your networking setup (e.g., how long it took for the node to receive the block). Ideally, `observed_delay` should be less than 3 seconds. In this example, the validator failed to attest to the block due to the block arriving late.

Another example of log:

```
DEBG Delayed head block, set_as_head_time_ms: 22, imported_time_ms: 312, attestable_delay_ms: 7052, available_delay_ms: 6874, execution_time_ms: 4694, consensus_time_ms: 232, blob_delay_ms: 2159, observed_delay_ms: 2179, total_delay_ms: 7209, slot: 1885922, proposer_index: 606896, block_root: 0x9966df24d24e722d7133068186f0caa098428696e9f441ac416d0aca70cc0a23, service: beacon, module: beacon_chain::canonical_head:1441
/159.69.68.247/tcp/9000, service: libp2p, module: lighthouse_network::service:1811
```

In this example, we see that the `execution_time_ms` is 4694ms. The `execution_time_ms` is how long the node took to process the block. The `execution_time_ms` of larger than 1 second suggests that there is slowness in processing the block. If the `execution_time_ms` is high, it could be due to high CPU usage, high I/O disk usage or the clients are doing some background maintenance processes.

### <a name="vc-head-vote"></a> Sometimes I miss the attestation head vote, resulting in penalty. Is this normal?

In general, it is unavoidable to have some penalties occasionally. This is particularly the case when you are assigned to attest on the first slot of an epoch and if the proposer of that slot releases the block late, then you will get penalised for missing the target and head votes. Your attestation performance does not only depend on your own setup, but also on everyone else's performance.

You could also check for the sync aggregate participation percentage on block explorers such as [beaconcha.in](https://beaconcha.in/). A low sync aggregate participation percentage (e.g., 60-70%) indicates that the block that you are assigned to attest to may be published late. As a result, your validator fails to correctly attest to the block.

Another possible reason for missing the head vote is due to a chain "reorg". A reorg can happen if the proposer publishes block `n` late, and the proposer of block `n+1` builds upon block `n-1` instead of `n`. This is called a "reorg". Due to the reorg, block `n` was never included in the chain.  If you are assigned to attest at slot `n`, it is possible you may still attest to block `n` despite most of the network recognizing the block as being late. In this case you will miss the head reward.

### <a name="vc-exit"></a> Can I submit a voluntary exit message without running a beacon node?

Yes. Beaconcha.in provides the tool to broadcast the message. You can create the voluntary exit message file with [ethdo](https://github.com/wealdtech/ethdo/releases) and submit the message via the [beaconcha.in](https://beaconcha.in/tools/broadcast) website. A guide on how to use `ethdo` to perform voluntary exit can be found [here](https://github.com/eth-educators/ethstaker-guides/blob/main/docs/voluntary-exit.md).

It is also noted that you can submit your BLS-to-execution-change message to update your withdrawal credentials from type `0x00` to `0x01` using the same link.

If you would like to still use Lighthouse to submit the message, you will need to run a beacon node and an execution client. For the beacon node, you can use checkpoint sync to quickly sync the chain under a minute. On the other hand, the execution client can be syncing and _needs not be synced_. This implies that it is possible to broadcast a voluntary exit message within a short time by quickly spinning up a node.

### <a name="vc-resource"></a> Does increasing the number of validators increase the CPU and other computer resources used?

A computer with hardware specifications stated in the [Recommended System Requirements](./installation.md#recommended-system-requirements) can run hundreds validators with only marginal increase in CPU usage.

### <a name="vc-reimport"></a> I want to add new validators. Do I have to reimport the existing keys?

No. You can just import new validator keys to the destination directory. If the `validator_keys` folder contains existing keys, that's fine as well because Lighthouse will skip importing existing keys.

### <a name="vc-import"></a> Do I have to stop `lighthouse vc` when importing new validator keys?

Generally yes.

If you do not want to stop `lighthouse vc`, you can use the [key manager API](./api_vc_endpoints.md) to import keys.

### <a name="vc-delete"></a> How can I delete my validator once it is imported?

You can use the `lighthouse vm delete` command to delete validator keys, see [validator manager delete](./validator_manager_api.md#delete).

If you are looking to delete the validators in one node and import it to another, you can use the [validator-manager](./validator_manager_move.md) to move the validators across nodes without the hassle of deleting and importing the keys.

## Network, Monitoring and Maintenance

### <a name="net-peer"></a> I have a low peer count and it is not increasing

If you cannot find _ANY_ peers at all, it is likely that you have incorrect
network configuration settings. Ensure that the network you wish to connect to
is correct (the beacon node outputs the network it is connecting to in the
initial boot-up log lines). On top of this, ensure that you are not using the
same `datadir` as a previous network, i.e., if you have been running the
`Hoodi` testnet and are now trying to join a new network but using the same
`datadir` (the `datadir` is also printed out in the beacon node's logs on
boot-up).

If you find yourself with a low peer count and it's not reaching the target you
expect, there are a few things to check on:

1. Ensure that port forward was correctly set up as described [here](./advanced_networking.md#nat-traversal-port-forwarding).

    To check that the ports are forwarded, run the command:

    ```bash
    curl http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/nat
    ```

    It should return `{"data":true}`. If it returns `{"data":false}`, you may want to double check if the port forward was correctly set up.

    If the ports are open, you should have incoming peers. To check that you have incoming peers, run the command:

    ```bash
    curl localhost:5052/lighthouse/peers | jq '.[] | select(.peer_info.connection_direction=="Incoming")'
    ```

    If you have incoming peers, it should return a lot of data containing information of peers. If the response is empty, it means that you have no incoming peers and there the ports are not open. You may want to double check if the port forward was correctly set up.

1. Check that you do not lower the number of peers using the flag `--target-peers`. The default is 200. A lower value set will lower the maximum number of peers your node can connect to, which may potentially interrupt the validator performance. We recommend users to leave the `--target peers` untouched to keep a diverse set of peers.

1. Ensure that you have a quality router for the internet connection. For example, if you connect the router to many devices including the node, it may be possible that the router cannot handle all routing tasks, hence struggling to keep up the number of peers. Therefore, using a quality router for the node is important to keep a healthy number of peers.

### <a name="net-update"></a> How do I update lighthouse?

If you are updating to new release binaries, it will be the same process as described [here.](./installation_binaries.md)

If you are updating by rebuilding from source, see [here.](./installation_source.md#update-lighthouse)

If you are running the docker image provided by Sigma Prime on Dockerhub, you can update to specific versions, for example:

```bash
docker pull sigp/lighthouse:v1.0.0
```

If you are building a docker image, the process will be similar to the one described [here.](./installation_docker.md#building-the-docker-image)
You just need to make sure the code you have checked out is up to date.

### <a name="net-port-forwarding"></a> Do I need to set up any port mappings (port forwarding)?

It is not strictly required to open any ports for Lighthouse to connect and
participate in the network. Lighthouse should work out-of-the-box. However, if
your node is not publicly accessible (you are behind a NAT or router that has
not been configured to allow access to Lighthouse ports) you will only be able
to reach peers who have a set up that is publicly accessible.

There are a number of undesired consequences of not making your Lighthouse node
publicly accessible.

Firstly, it will make it more difficult for your node to find peers, as your
node will not be added to the global DHT and other peers will not be able
to initiate connections with you.
Secondly, the peers in your peer store are more likely to end connections with
you and be less performant as these peers will likely be overloaded with
subscribing peers. The reason being, that peers that have correct port
forwarding (publicly accessible) are in higher demand than regular peers as other nodes behind NAT's
will also be looking for these peers.
Finally, not making your node publicly accessible degrades the overall network, making it more difficult for other
peers to join and degrades the overall connectivity of the global network.

For these reasons, we recommend that you make your node publicly accessible.

Lighthouse supports UPnP. If you are behind a NAT with a router that supports
UPnP, you can simply ensure UPnP is enabled (Lighthouse will inform you in its
initial logs if a route has been established). You can also manually [set up port mappings/port forwarding](./advanced_networking.md#how-to-open-ports) in your router to your local Lighthouse instance. By default,
Lighthouse uses port 9000 for both TCP and UDP, and optionally 9001 UDP for QUIC support.
Opening these ports will make your Lighthouse node maximally contactable.

### <a name="net-monitor"></a> How can I monitor my validators?

Apart from using block explorers, you may use the "Validator Monitor" built into Lighthouse which
provides logging and Prometheus/Grafana metrics for individual validators. See [Validator
Monitoring](./validator_monitoring.md) for more information. Lighthouse has also developed Lighthouse UI (Siren) to monitor performance, see [Lighthouse UI (Siren)](./ui.md).

### <a name="net-bn-vc"></a> My beacon node and validator client are on different servers. How can I point the validator client to the beacon node?

The setting on the beacon node is the same for both cases below. In the beacon node, specify `lighthouse bn --http-address local_IP` so that the beacon node is listening on the local network rather than `localhost`. You can find the `local_IP` by running the command `hostname -I | awk '{print $1}'` on the server running the beacon node.

1. If the beacon node and validator clients are on different servers _in the same network_, the setting in the validator client is as follows:

   Use the flag `--beacon-nodes` to point to the beacon node. For example, `lighthouse vc --beacon-nodes http://local_IP:5052` where `local_IP` is the local IP address of the beacon node and `5052` is the default `http-port` of the beacon node.

   If you have firewall setup, e.g., `ufw`, you will need to allow port 5052 (assuming that the default port is used) with `sudo ufw allow 5052`. Note: this will allow all IP addresses to access the HTTP API of the beacon node. If you are on an untrusted network (e.g., a university or public WiFi) or the host is exposed to the internet, use apply IP-address filtering as described later in this section.

   You can test that the setup is working with by running the following command on the validator client host:

   ```bash
   curl "http://local_IP:5052/eth/v1/node/version"
   ```

   You can refer to [Redundancy](./advanced_redundancy.md) for more information.

2. If the beacon node and validator clients are on different servers _and different networks_, it is necessary to perform port forwarding of the SSH port (e.g., the default port 22) on the router, and also allow firewall on the SSH port. The connection can be established via port forwarding on the router.

      In the validator client, use the flag `--beacon-nodes` to point to the beacon node. However, since the beacon node and the validator client are on different networks, the IP address to use is the public IP address of the beacon node, i.e., `lighthouse vc --beacon-nodes http://public_IP:5052`. You can get the public IP address of the beacon node by running the command `dig +short myip.opendns.com @resolver1.opendns.com` on the server running the beacon node.

      Additionally, port forwarding of port 5052 on the router connected to the beacon node is required for the vc to connect to the bn. To do port forwarding, refer to [how to open ports](./advanced_networking.md#how-to-open-ports).

      If you have firewall setup, e.g., `ufw`, you will need to allow connections to port 5052 (assuming that the default port is used). Since the beacon node HTTP/HTTPS API is public-facing (i.e., the 5052 port is now exposed to the internet due to port forwarding), we strongly recommend users to apply IP-address filtering to the BN/VC connection from malicious actors. This can be done using the command:

      ```bash
      sudo ufw allow from vc_IP_address proto tcp to any port 5052
      ```

      where `vc_IP_address` is the public IP address of the validator client. The command will only allow connections to the beacon node from the validator client IP address to prevent malicious attacks on the beacon node over the internet.

It is also worth noting that the `--beacon-nodes` flag can also be used for redundancy of beacon nodes. For example, let's say you have a beacon node and a validator client running on the same host, and a second beacon node on another server as a backup. In this case, you can use `lighthouse vc --beacon-nodes http://localhost:5052, http://IP-address:5052` on the validator client.

### <a name="net-ip"></a> Should I do anything to the beacon node or validator client settings if I have a relocation of the node / change of IP address?

No. Lighthouse will auto-detect the change and update your Ethereum Node Record (ENR). You just need to make sure you are not manually setting the ENR with `--enr-address` (which, for common use cases, this flag is not used).

### <a name="net-port"></a> How to change the TCP/UDP port 9000 that Lighthouse listens on?

Use the flag `--port <PORT>` in the beacon node. This flag can be useful when you are running two beacon nodes at the same time. You can leave one beacon node as the default port 9000, and configure the second beacon node to listen on, e.g., `--port 9100`.
Since V4.5.0, Lighthouse supports QUIC and by default will use the value of `--port` + 1 to listen via UDP (default `9001`).
This can be configured by using the flag `--quic-port`. Refer to [Advanced Networking](./advanced_networking.md#nat-traversal-port-forwarding) for more information.

### <a name="net-subnet"></a> Lighthouse `v4.3.0` introduces a change where a node will subscribe to only 2 subnets in total. I am worried that this will impact my validators return

Previously, having more validators means subscribing to more subnets. Since the change, a node will now only subscribe to 2 subnets in total. This will bring about significant reductions in bandwidth for nodes with multiple validators.

While subscribing to more subnets can ensure you have peers on a wider range of subnets, these subscriptions consume resources and bandwidth. This does not significantly increase the performance of the node, however it does benefit other nodes on the network.

If you would still like to subscribe to all subnets, you can use the flag `subscribe-all-subnets`. This may improve the block rewards by 1-5%, though it comes at the cost of a much higher bandwidth requirement.

### <a name="net-quic"></a> How to know how many of my peers are connected via QUIC?

With `--metrics` enabled in the beacon node, the [Grafana Network dashboard](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse-metrics/blob/master/dashboards/Network.json) displays the connected by transport, which will show the number of peers connected via QUIC.

Alternatively, you can find the number of peers connected via QUIC manually using:

```bash
 curl -s "http://localhost:5054/metrics" | grep 'transport="quic"'
```

A response example is:

```text
libp2p_peers_multi{direction="inbound",transport="quic"} 27
libp2p_peers_multi{direction="none",transport="quic"} 0
libp2p_peers_multi{direction="outbound",transport="quic"} 9
```

which shows that there are a total of 36 peers connected via QUIC.

## Miscellaneous

### <a name="misc-slashing"></a> What should I do if I lose my slashing protection database?

See [here](./validator_slashing_protection.md#misplaced-slashing-database).

### <a name="misc-compile"></a> I can't compile lighthouse

See [here.](./installation_source.md#troubleshooting)

### <a name="misc-version"></a> How do I check the version of Lighthouse that is running?

If you build Lighthouse from source, run `lighthouse --version`. Example of output:

```bash
Lighthouse v4.1.0-693886b
BLS library: blst-modern
SHA256 hardware acceleration: false
Allocator: jemalloc
Specs: mainnet (true), minimal (false), gnosis (true)
```

If you download the binary file, navigate to the location of the directory, for example, the binary file is in `/usr/local/bin`, run `/usr/local/bin/lighthouse --version`, the example of output is the same as above.

Alternatively, if you have Lighthouse running, on the same computer, you can run:

```bash
curl "http://127.0.0.1:5052/eth/v1/node/version"
```

Example of output:

```bash
{"data":{"version":"Lighthouse/v4.1.0-693886b/x86_64-linux"}}
```

which says that the version is v4.1.0.

### <a name="misc-prune"></a> Does Lighthouse have pruning function like the execution client to save disk space?

Yes, Lighthouse supports [state pruning](./advanced_database_migrations.md#how-to-prune-historic-states) which can help to save disk space.

### <a name="misc-freezer"></a> Can I use a HDD for the freezer database and only have the hot db on SSD?

Yes, you can do so by using the flag `--freezer-dir /path/to/freezer_db` in the beacon node.

### <a name="misc-timestamp"></a> Can Lighthouse log in local timestamp instead of UTC?

The reason why Lighthouse logs in UTC is due to the dependency on an upstream library that is [yet to be resolved](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3130). Alternatively, using the flag `disable-log-timestamp` in combination with systemd will suppress the UTC timestamps and print the logs in local timestamps.

### <a name="misc-full"></a> My hard disk is full and my validator is down. What should I do?

A quick way to get the validator back online is by removing the Lighthouse beacon node database and resync Lighthouse using checkpoint sync. A guide to do this can be found in the [Lighthouse Discord server](https://discord.com/channels/605577013327167508/605577013331361793/1019755522985050142). With some free space left, you will then be able to prune the execution client database to free up more space.
