gnosis/lighthouse
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git synced 2026-04-18 13:28:33 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fixes after merge

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
realbigsean
2023-07-17 09:50:32 -04:00
parent b96db45090
commit 0f514cbb36
5 changed files with 30 additions and 45 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

65
beacon_node/execution_layer/src/lib.rs
View File

@@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ impl<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>> BlockProposalContents<T, Paylo
BlockProposalContents::Payload {
payload: Payload::default_at_fork(fork_name)?,
block_value: Uint256::zero(),
_phantom: PhantomData,
}
}
ForkName::Deneb => BlockProposalContents::PayloadAndBlobs {
@@ -939,7 +938,6 @@ impl<T: EthSpec> ExecutionLayer<T> {
BlockProposalContents::Payload {
payload: relay.data.message.header,
block_value: relay.data.message.value,
_phantom: PhantomData,
},
)),
Err(reason) if !reason.payload_invalid() => {
@@ -994,7 +992,6 @@ impl<T: EthSpec> ExecutionLayer<T> {
BlockProposalContents::Payload {
payload: relay.data.message.header,
block_value: relay.data.message.value,
_phantom: PhantomData,
},
)),
// If the payload is valid then use it. The local EE failed
@@ -1003,7 +1000,6 @@ impl<T: EthSpec> ExecutionLayer<T> {
BlockProposalContents::Payload {
payload: relay.data.message.header,
block_value: relay.data.message.value,
_phantom: PhantomData,
},
)),
Err(reason) => {
@@ -1182,36 +1178,30 @@ impl<T: EthSpec> ExecutionLayer<T> {
"parent_hash" => ?parent_hash,
);
engine.api.get_payload::<T>(current_fork, payload_id).await
};
let payload_response = payload_fut.await;
let (execution_payload, block_value) = payload_response.map(|payload_response| {
if payload_response.execution_payload_ref().fee_recipient() != payload_attributes.suggested_fee_recipient() {
error!(
self.log(),
"Inconsistent fee recipient";
"msg" => "The fee recipient returned from the Execution Engine differs \
from the suggested_fee_recipient set on the beacon node. This could \
indicate that fees are being diverted to another address. Please \
ensure that the value of suggested_fee_recipient is set correctly and \
that the Execution Engine is trusted.",
"fee_recipient" => ?payload_response.execution_payload_ref().fee_recipient(),
"suggested_fee_recipient" => ?payload_attributes.suggested_fee_recipient(),
);
}
if f(self, payload_response.execution_payload_ref()).is_some() {
warn!(
self.log(),
"Duplicate payload cached, this might indicate redundant proposal \
attempts."
);
}
payload_response.into()
})?;
Ok(BlockProposalContents::Payload {
payload: execution_payload.into(),
block_value,
_phantom: PhantomData,
})
}.await?;
if payload_response.execution_payload_ref().fee_recipient() != payload_attributes.suggested_fee_recipient() {
error!(
self.log(),
"Inconsistent fee recipient";
"msg" => "The fee recipient returned from the Execution Engine differs \
from the suggested_fee_recipient set on the beacon node. This could \
indicate that fees are being diverted to another address. Please \
ensure that the value of suggested_fee_recipient is set correctly and \
that the Execution Engine is trusted.",
"fee_recipient" => ?payload_response.execution_payload_ref().fee_recipient(),
"suggested_fee_recipient" => ?payload_attributes.suggested_fee_recipient(),
);
}
if f(self, payload_response.execution_payload_ref()).is_some() {
warn!(
self.log(),
"Duplicate payload cached, this might indicate redundant proposal \
attempts."
);
}
Ok(payload_response.into())
})
.await
.map_err(Box::new)
@@ -2136,13 +2126,6 @@ async fn timed_future<F: Future<Output = T>, T>(metric: &str, future: F) -> (T,
(result, duration)
}
fn noop<T: EthSpec>(
_: &ExecutionLayer<T>,
_: ExecutionPayloadRef<T>,
) -> Option<ExecutionPayload<T>> {
None
}
#[cfg(test)]
/// Returns the duration since the unix epoch.
fn timestamp_now() -> u64 {