Delayed RPC Send Using Tokens (#5923)

closes https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/5785


  The diagram below shows the differences in how the receiver (responder) behaves before and after this PR. The following sentences will detail the changes.

```mermaid
flowchart TD

subgraph "*** After ***"
Start2([START]) --> AA[Receive request]
AA --> COND1{Is there already an active request <br> with the same protocol?}
COND1 --> |Yes| CC[Send error response]
CC --> End2([END])
%% COND1 --> |No| COND2{Request is too large?}
%% COND2 --> |Yes| CC
COND1 --> |No| DD[Process request]
DD --> EE{Rate limit reached?}
EE --> |Yes| FF[Wait until tokens are regenerated]
FF --> EE
EE --> |No| GG[Send response]
GG --> End2
end

subgraph "*** Before ***"
Start([START]) --> A[Receive request]
A --> B{Rate limit reached <br> or <br> request is too large?}
B -->|Yes| C[Send error response]
C --> End([END])
B -->|No| E[Process request]
E --> F[Send response]
F --> End
end
```

### `Is there already an active request with the same protocol?`

This check is not performed in `Before`. This is taken from the PR in the consensus-spec, which proposes updates regarding rate limiting and response timeout.
https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3767/files
> The requester MUST NOT make more than two concurrent requests with the same ID.

The PR mentions the requester side. In this PR, I introduced the `ActiveRequestsLimiter` for the `responder` side to restrict more than two requests from running simultaneously on the same protocol per peer. If the limiter disallows a request, the responder sends a rate-limited error and penalizes the requester.



### `Rate limit reached?` and `Wait until tokens are regenerated`

UPDATE: I moved the limiter logic to the behaviour side. https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/5923#issuecomment-2379535927

~~The rate limiter is shared between the behaviour and the handler.  (`Arc<Mutex<RateLimiter>>>`) The handler checks the rate limit and queues the response if the limit is reached. The behaviour handles pruning.~~

~~I considered not sharing the rate limiter between the behaviour and the handler, and performing all of these either within the behaviour or handler. However, I decided against this for the following reasons:~~

- ~~Regarding performing everything within the behaviour: The behaviour is unable to recognize the response protocol when `RPC::send_response()` is called, especially when the response is `RPCCodedResponse::Error`. Therefore, the behaviour can't rate limit responses based on the response protocol.~~
- ~~Regarding performing everything within the handler: When multiple connections are established with a peer, there could be multiple handlers interacting with that peer. Thus, we cannot enforce rate limiting per peer solely within the handler. (Any ideas? 🤔 )~~

beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/rpc/handler.rs

@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ where
     /// Waker, to be sure the handler gets polled when needed.
     waker: Option<std::task::Waker>,
 
-    /// Timeout that will me used for inbound and outbound responses.
+    /// Timeout that will be used for inbound and outbound responses.
     resp_timeout: Duration,
 }
 
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ where
             }
             return;
         };
+
         // If the response we are sending is an error, report back for handling
         if let RpcResponse::Error(ref code, ref reason) = response {
             self.events_out.push(HandlerEvent::Err(HandlerErr::Inbound {
@@ -331,6 +332,7 @@ where
                     "Response not sent. Deactivated handler");
             return;
         }
+
         inbound_info.pending_items.push_back(response);
     }
 }