gnosis/lighthouse
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git synced 2026-03-09 19:51:47 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update to consensus-specs v1.1.9 (#3016)

Browse Source 
## Issue Addressed

Closes #3014

## Proposed Changes

- Rename `receipt_root` to `receipts_root`
- Rename `execute_payload` to `notify_new_payload`
   - This is slightly weird since we modify everything except the actual HTTP call to the engine API. That change is expected to be implemented in #2985 (cc @ethDreamer)
- Enable "random" tests for Bellatrix.

## Notes

This will break *partially* compatibility with Kintusgi testnets in order to gain compatibility with [Kiln](https://hackmd.io/@n0ble/kiln-spec) testnets. I think it will only break the BN APIs due to the `receipts_root` change, however it might have some other effects too.

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Hauner
2022-02-14 23:57:23 +00:00
parent 886afd684a
commit 2f8531dc60
21 changed files with 61 additions and 44 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/http.rs
View File

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ impl EngineApi for HttpJsonRpc {
.await
}
async fn execute_payload_v1<T: EthSpec>(
async fn notify_new_payload_v1<T: EthSpec>(
&self,
execution_payload: ExecutionPayload<T>,
) -> Result<ExecutePayloadResponse, Error> {
@@ -486,16 +486,16 @@ mod test {
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn execute_payload_v1_request() {
async fn notify_new_payload_v1_request() {
Tester::new()
.assert_request_equals(
|client| async move {
let _ = client
.execute_payload_v1::<MainnetEthSpec>(ExecutionPayload {
.notify_new_payload_v1::<MainnetEthSpec>(ExecutionPayload {
parent_hash: Hash256::repeat_byte(0),
fee_recipient: Address::repeat_byte(1),
state_root: Hash256::repeat_byte(1),
receipt_root: Hash256::repeat_byte(0),
receipts_root: Hash256::repeat_byte(0),
logs_bloom: vec![1; 256].into(),
random: Hash256::repeat_byte(1),
block_number: 0,
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ mod test {
parent_hash: Hash256::from_str("0x3b8fb240d288781d4aac94d3fd16809ee413bc99294a085798a589dae51ddd4a").unwrap(),
fee_recipient: Address::from_str("0xa94f5374fce5edbc8e2a8697c15331677e6ebf0b").unwrap(),
state_root: Hash256::from_str("0xca3149fa9e37db08d1cd49c9061db1002ef1cd58db2210f2115c8c989b2bdf45").unwrap(),
receipt_root: Hash256::from_str("0x56e81f171bcc55a6ff8345e692c0f86e5b48e01b996cadc001622fb5e363b421").unwrap(),
receipts_root: Hash256::from_str("0x56e81f171bcc55a6ff8345e692c0f86e5b48e01b996cadc001622fb5e363b421").unwrap(),
logs_bloom: vec![0; 256].into(),
random: Hash256::zero(),
block_number: 1,
@@ -723,11 +723,11 @@ mod test {
// engine_executePayloadV1 REQUEST validation
|client| async move {
let _ = client
.execute_payload_v1::<MainnetEthSpec>(ExecutionPayload {
.notify_new_payload_v1::<MainnetEthSpec>(ExecutionPayload {
parent_hash: Hash256::from_str("0x3b8fb240d288781d4aac94d3fd16809ee413bc99294a085798a589dae51ddd4a").unwrap(),
fee_recipient: Address::from_str("0xa94f5374fce5edbc8e2a8697c15331677e6ebf0b").unwrap(),
state_root: Hash256::from_str("0xca3149fa9e37db08d1cd49c9061db1002ef1cd58db2210f2115c8c989b2bdf45").unwrap(),
receipt_root: Hash256::from_str("0x56e81f171bcc55a6ff8345e692c0f86e5b48e01b996cadc001622fb5e363b421").unwrap(),
receipts_root: Hash256::from_str("0x56e81f171bcc55a6ff8345e692c0f86e5b48e01b996cadc001622fb5e363b421").unwrap(),
logs_bloom: vec![0; 256].into(),
random: Hash256::zero(),
block_number: 1,
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ mod test {
})],
|client| async move {
let response = client
.execute_payload_v1::<MainnetEthSpec>(ExecutionPayload::default())
.notify_new_payload_v1::<MainnetEthSpec>(ExecutionPayload::default())
.await
.unwrap();