mirror of
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git
synced 2026-04-18 05:18:30 +00:00
Directory Restructure (#1163)
* Move tests -> testing * Directory restructure * Update Cargo.toml during restructure * Update Makefile during restructure * Fix arbitrary path
This commit is contained in:
346
testing/state_transition_vectors/src/exit.rs
Normal file
346
testing/state_transition_vectors/src/exit.rs
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
use state_processing::{
|
||||
per_block_processing, per_block_processing::errors::ExitInvalid,
|
||||
test_utils::BlockProcessingBuilder, BlockProcessingError, BlockSignatureStrategy,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use types::{BeaconBlock, BeaconState, Epoch, EthSpec, SignedBeaconBlock};
|
||||
|
||||
// Default validator index to exit.
|
||||
pub const VALIDATOR_INDEX: u64 = 0;
|
||||
// Epoch that the state will be transitioned to by default, equal to PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD.
|
||||
pub const STATE_EPOCH: Epoch = Epoch::new(2048);
|
||||
|
||||
struct ExitTest {
|
||||
validator_index: u64,
|
||||
exit_epoch: Epoch,
|
||||
state_epoch: Epoch,
|
||||
block_modifier: Box<dyn FnOnce(&mut BeaconBlock<E>)>,
|
||||
builder_modifier: Box<dyn FnOnce(BlockProcessingBuilder<E>) -> BlockProcessingBuilder<E>>,
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
expected: Result<(), BlockProcessingError>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Default for ExitTest {
|
||||
fn default() -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
validator_index: VALIDATOR_INDEX,
|
||||
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||||
state_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||||
block_modifier: Box::new(|_| ()),
|
||||
builder_modifier: Box::new(|x| x),
|
||||
expected: Ok(()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl ExitTest {
|
||||
fn block_and_pre_state(self) -> (SignedBeaconBlock<E>, BeaconState<E>) {
|
||||
let spec = &E::default_spec();
|
||||
|
||||
(self.builder_modifier)(
|
||||
get_builder(spec, self.state_epoch.as_u64(), VALIDATOR_COUNT)
|
||||
.insert_exit(self.validator_index, self.exit_epoch)
|
||||
.modify(self.block_modifier),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.build(None, None)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn process(
|
||||
block: &SignedBeaconBlock<E>,
|
||||
state: &mut BeaconState<E>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), BlockProcessingError> {
|
||||
per_block_processing(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
block,
|
||||
None,
|
||||
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
|
||||
&E::default_spec(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
fn run(self) -> BeaconState<E> {
|
||||
let spec = &E::default_spec();
|
||||
let expected = self.expected.clone();
|
||||
assert_eq!(STATE_EPOCH, spec.persistent_committee_period);
|
||||
|
||||
let (block, mut state) = self.block_and_pre_state();
|
||||
|
||||
let result = Self::process(&block, &mut state);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, expected);
|
||||
|
||||
state
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn test_vector(self, title: String) -> TestVector {
|
||||
let (block, pre_state) = self.block_and_pre_state();
|
||||
let mut post_state = pre_state.clone();
|
||||
let (post_state, error) = match Self::process(&block, &mut post_state) {
|
||||
Ok(_) => (Some(post_state), None),
|
||||
Err(e) => (None, Some(format!("{:?}", e))),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
TestVector {
|
||||
title,
|
||||
block,
|
||||
pre_state,
|
||||
post_state,
|
||||
error,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
vectors_and_tests!(
|
||||
// Ensures we can process a valid exit,
|
||||
valid_single_exit,
|
||||
ExitTest::default(),
|
||||
// Tests three exists in the same block.
|
||||
valid_three_exits,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
builder_modifier: Box::new(|builder| {
|
||||
builder
|
||||
.insert_exit(1, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||||
.insert_exit(2, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Ensures that a validator cannot be exited twice in the same block.
|
||||
invalid_duplicate,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
block_modifier: Box::new(|block| {
|
||||
// Duplicate the exit
|
||||
let exit = block.body.voluntary_exits[0].clone();
|
||||
block.body.voluntary_exits.push(exit).unwrap();
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 1,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::AlreadyExited(0),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// validator = state.validators[voluntary_exit.validator_index]
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_validator_unknown,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
block_modifier: Box::new(|block| {
|
||||
block.body.voluntary_exits[0].message.validator_index = VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::ValidatorUnknown(VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// # Verify exit has not been initiated
|
||||
// assert validator.exit_epoch == FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_exit_already_initiated,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
builder_modifier: Box::new(|mut builder| {
|
||||
builder.state.validators[0].exit_epoch = STATE_EPOCH + 1;
|
||||
builder
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::AlreadyExited(0),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// # Verify the validator is active
|
||||
// assert is_active_validator(validator, get_current_epoch(state))
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_not_active_before_activation_epoch,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
builder_modifier: Box::new(|mut builder| {
|
||||
builder.state.validators[0].activation_epoch = builder.spec.far_future_epoch;
|
||||
builder
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::NotActive(0),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Also tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// # Verify the validator is active
|
||||
// assert is_active_validator(validator, get_current_epoch(state))
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_not_active_after_exit_epoch,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
builder_modifier: Box::new(|mut builder| {
|
||||
builder.state.validators[0].exit_epoch = STATE_EPOCH;
|
||||
builder
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::NotActive(0),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Ensures we can process an exit from genesis.
|
||||
valid_genesis_epoch,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
exit_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Ensures we can process an exit from the previous epoch.
|
||||
valid_previous_epoch,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// # Exits must specify an epoch when they become valid; they are not
|
||||
// # valid before then
|
||||
// assert get_current_epoch(state) >= voluntary_exit.epoch
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_future_exit_epoch,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH + 1,
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::FutureEpoch {
|
||||
state: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||||
exit: STATE_EPOCH + 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// # Verify the validator has been active long enough
|
||||
// assert get_current_epoch(state) >= validator.activation_epoch + PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_too_young_by_one_epoch,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
state_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||||
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::TooYoungToExit {
|
||||
current_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||||
earliest_exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Also tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// # Verify the validator has been active long enough
|
||||
// assert get_current_epoch(state) >= validator.activation_epoch + PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_too_young_by_a_lot,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
state_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
exit_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::TooYoungToExit {
|
||||
current_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
earliest_exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v0.11.2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```ignore
|
||||
// # Verify signature
|
||||
// domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_VOLUNTARY_EXIT,
|
||||
// voluntary_exit.epoch)
|
||||
// signing_root = compute_signing_root(voluntary_exit, domain)
|
||||
// assert bls.Verify(validator.pubkey, signing_root,
|
||||
// signed_voluntary_exit.signature)
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
invalid_bad_signature,
|
||||
ExitTest {
|
||||
block_modifier: Box::new(|block| {
|
||||
// Shift the validator index by 1 so that it's mismatched from the key that was
|
||||
// used to sign.
|
||||
block.body.voluntary_exits[0].message.validator_index = VALIDATOR_INDEX + 1;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
reason: ExitInvalid::BadSignature,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod custom_tests {
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
|
||||
fn assert_exited(state: &BeaconState<E>, validator_index: usize) {
|
||||
let spec = E::default_spec();
|
||||
|
||||
let validator = &state.validators[validator_index];
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
validator.exit_epoch,
|
||||
// This is correct until we exceed the churn limit. If that happens, we
|
||||
// need to introduce more complex logic.
|
||||
state.current_epoch() + 1 + spec.max_seed_lookahead,
|
||||
"exit epoch"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
validator.withdrawable_epoch,
|
||||
validator.exit_epoch + E::default_spec().min_validator_withdrawability_delay,
|
||||
"withdrawable epoch"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn valid() {
|
||||
let state = ExitTest::default().run();
|
||||
assert_exited(&state, VALIDATOR_INDEX as usize);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn valid_three() {
|
||||
let state = ExitTest {
|
||||
builder_modifier: Box::new(|builder| {
|
||||
builder
|
||||
.insert_exit(1, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||||
.insert_exit(2, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||||
}),
|
||||
..ExitTest::default()
|
||||
}
|
||||
.run();
|
||||
|
||||
for i in &[VALIDATOR_INDEX, 1, 2] {
|
||||
assert_exited(&state, *i as usize);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user