Correct reward denominator in op pool (#5047)

Closes #5016


  The op pool was using the wrong denominator when calculating proposer block rewards! This was mostly inconsequential as our studies of Lighthouse's block profitability already showed that it is very close to optimal. The wrong denominator was leftover from phase0 code, and wasn't properly updated for Altair.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Sproul
2025-05-20 11:06:40 +10:00
committed by GitHub
parent af87135e30
commit 805c2dc831
3 changed files with 29 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ mod reward_cache;
mod sync_aggregate_id;
pub use crate::bls_to_execution_changes::ReceivedPreCapella;
pub use attestation::{earliest_attestation_validators, AttMaxCover};
pub use attestation::{earliest_attestation_validators, AttMaxCover, PROPOSER_REWARD_DENOMINATOR};
pub use attestation_storage::{CompactAttestationRef, SplitAttestation};
pub use max_cover::MaxCover;
pub use persistence::{
@@ -1402,7 +1402,8 @@ mod release_tests {
.retain(|validator_index, _| !seen_indices.contains(validator_index));
// Check that rewards are in decreasing order
let rewards = fresh_validators_rewards.values().sum();
let rewards =
fresh_validators_rewards.values().sum::<u64>() / PROPOSER_REWARD_DENOMINATOR;
assert!(prev_reward >= rewards);
prev_reward = rewards;
seen_indices.extend(fresh_validators_rewards.keys());