mirror of
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git
synced 2026-03-15 02:42:38 +00:00
Solve one FIXME, add two more..
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ pub fn initiate_validator_exit<T: EthSpec>(
|
||||
index: usize,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
// Return if the validator already initiated exit
|
||||
if state.get_validator(index)?.exit_epoch() != spec.far_future_epoch {
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We do things in a slightly different order to the spec here. Instead of immediately checking
|
||||
// whether the validator has already exited, we instead prepare the exit cache and compute the
|
||||
// cheap-to-calculate values from that. *Then* we look up the validator a single time in the
|
||||
// validator tree (expensive), make the check and mutate as appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the exit cache is built.
|
||||
state.build_exit_cache(spec)?;
|
||||
@@ -28,15 +28,21 @@ pub fn initiate_validator_exit<T: EthSpec>(
|
||||
exit_queue_epoch.safe_add_assign(1)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
state
|
||||
.exit_cache_mut()
|
||||
.record_validator_exit(exit_queue_epoch)?;
|
||||
let validator = state.get_validator_cow(index)?;
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME(sproul): could avoid this second lookup with some clever borrowing
|
||||
let mut validator = state.get_validator_mut(index)?;
|
||||
// Return if the validator already initiated exit
|
||||
if validator.exit_epoch() != spec.far_future_epoch {
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let validator = validator.to_mut();
|
||||
validator.mutable.exit_epoch = exit_queue_epoch;
|
||||
validator.mutable.withdrawable_epoch =
|
||||
exit_queue_epoch.safe_add(spec.min_validator_withdrawability_delay)?;
|
||||
|
||||
state
|
||||
.exit_cache_mut()
|
||||
.record_validator_exit(exit_queue_epoch)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,9 +66,11 @@ impl EpochCache {
|
||||
|
||||
// The cache should never be constructed at slot 0 because it should only be used for
|
||||
// block processing (which implies slot > 0) or epoch processing (which implies slot >= 32).
|
||||
/* FIXME(sproul): EF tests like this
|
||||
if decision_block_root.is_zero() {
|
||||
return Err(EpochCacheError::InvalidSlot { slot: state.slot() });
|
||||
}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// Compute base rewards.
|
||||
let total_active_balance = state.get_total_active_balance()?;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user