Rename random to prev_randao (#3040)

## Issue Addressed

As discussed on last-night's consensus call, the testnets next week will target the [Kiln Spec v2](https://hackmd.io/@n0ble/kiln-spec).

Presently, we support Kiln V1. V2 is backwards compatible, except for renaming `random` to `prev_randao` in:

- https://github.com/ethereum/execution-apis/pull/180
- https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2835

With this PR we'll no longer be compatible with the existing Kintsugi and Kiln testnets, however we'll be ready for the testnets next week. I raised this breaking change in the call last night, we are all keen to move forward and break things.

We now target the [`merge-kiln-v2`](https://github.com/MariusVanDerWijden/go-ethereum/tree/merge-kiln-v2) branch for interop with Geth. This required adding the `--http.aauthport` to the tester to avoid a port conflict at startup.

### Changes to exec integration tests

There's some change in the `merge-kiln-v2` version of Geth that means it can't compile on a vanilla Github runner. Bumping the `go` version on the runner solved this issue.

Whilst addressing this, I refactored the `testing/execution_integration` crate to be a *binary* rather than a *library* with tests. This means that we don't need to run the `build.rs` and build Geth whenever someone runs `make lint` or `make test-release`. This is nice for everyday users, but it's also nice for CI so that we can have a specific runner for these tests and we don't need to ensure *all* runners support everything required to build all execution clients.

## More Info

- [x] ~~EF tests are failing since the rename has broken some tests that reference the old field name. I have been told there will be new tests released in the coming days (25/02/22 or 26/02/22).~~
This commit is contained in:
Paul Hauner
2022-03-03 02:10:57 +00:00
parent 4bf1af4e85
commit aea43b626b
31 changed files with 304 additions and 221 deletions

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ use crate::{
ExecutionPayloadError,
};
use execution_layer::PayloadStatus;
use fork_choice::PayloadVerificationStatus;
use fork_choice::{InvalidationOperation, PayloadVerificationStatus};
use proto_array::{Block as ProtoBlock, ExecutionStatus};
use slog::debug;
use slot_clock::SlotClock;
@@ -68,7 +68,13 @@ pub fn notify_new_payload<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
// This block has not yet been applied to fork choice, so the latest block that was
// imported to fork choice was the parent.
let latest_root = block.parent_root();
chain.process_invalid_execution_payload(latest_root, Some(latest_valid_hash))?;
chain.process_invalid_execution_payload(
&InvalidationOperation::InvalidateMany {
head_block_root: latest_root,
always_invalidate_head: false,
latest_valid_ancestor: latest_valid_hash,
},
)?;
Err(ExecutionPayloadError::RejectedByExecutionEngine { status }.into())
}
@@ -145,11 +151,19 @@ pub fn validate_merge_block<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
.slot_clock
.now()
.ok_or(BeaconChainError::UnableToReadSlot)?;
// Check the optimistic sync conditions. Note that because this is the merge block,
// the justified checkpoint can't have execution enabled so we only need to check the
// current slot is at least SAFE_SLOTS_TO_IMPORT_OPTIMISTICALLY ahead of the block
// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/v1.1.9/sync/optimistic.md#when-to-optimistically-import-blocks
if block.slot() + chain.spec.safe_slots_to_import_optimistically <= current_slot {
// Ensure the block is a candidate for optimistic import.
if chain
.fork_choice
.read()
.is_optimistic_candidate_block(
current_slot,
block.slot(),
&block.parent_root(),
&chain.spec,
)
.map_err(BeaconChainError::from)?
{
debug!(
chain.log,
"Optimistically accepting terminal block";