Queue deposit requests and apply them during epoch processing

This commit is contained in:
Pawan Dhananjay
2024-10-11 17:56:30 -07:00
parent 0a4e6be223
commit c0cac0e2cd
14 changed files with 284 additions and 128 deletions

View File

@@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ pub fn initialize_beacon_state_from_eth1<E: EthSpec>(
let post = upgrade_state_to_electra(&mut state, Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0), spec)?;
state = post;
// TODO(electra): do we need to iterate over an empty pending_deposits list here and increase balance?!
// Remove intermediate Deneb fork from `state.fork`.
state.fork_mut().previous_version = spec.electra_fork_version;

View File

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ use crate::common::{
};
use crate::per_block_processing::errors::{BlockProcessingError, IntoWithIndex};
use crate::VerifySignatures;
use errors::DepositInvalid;
use types::consts::altair::{PARTICIPATION_FLAG_WEIGHTS, PROPOSER_WEIGHT, WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR};
use types::typenum::U33;
@@ -449,47 +450,73 @@ pub fn apply_deposit<E: EthSpec>(
if let Some(index) = validator_index {
// [Modified in Electra:EIP7251]
if let Ok(pending_balance_deposits) = state.pending_balance_deposits_mut() {
pending_balance_deposits.push(PendingBalanceDeposit { index, amount })?;
if let Ok(pending_deposits) = state.pending_deposits_mut() {
pending_deposits.push(PendingDeposit {
pubkey: deposit_data.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: deposit_data.withdrawal_credentials,
amount,
signature: deposit_data.signature.decompress().map_err(|_| {
BlockProcessingError::DepositInvalid {
index: deposit_index,
reason: DepositInvalid::BadBlsBytes,
}
})?,
slot: spec.genesis_slot, // Use `genesis_slot` to distinguish from a pending deposit request
})?;
} else {
// Update the existing validator balance.
increase_balance(state, index as usize, amount)?;
}
} else {
}
// New validator
else {
// The signature should be checked for new validators. Return early for a bad
// signature.
if is_valid_deposit_signature(&deposit_data, spec).is_err() {
return Ok(());
}
let new_validator_index = state.validators().len();
// [Modified in Electra:EIP7251]
let (effective_balance, state_balance) = if state.fork_name_unchecked() >= ForkName::Electra
{
(0, 0)
if state.fork_name_unchecked() >= ForkName::Electra {
// Create a new validator.
let mut validator = Validator {
pubkey: deposit_data.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: deposit_data.withdrawal_credentials,
activation_eligibility_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
activation_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
exit_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
withdrawable_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
effective_balance: 0,
slashed: false,
};
let max_effective_balance =
validator.get_max_effective_balance(spec, state.fork_name_unchecked());
validator.effective_balance = std::cmp::min(
amount.safe_sub(amount.safe_rem(spec.effective_balance_increment)?)?,
max_effective_balance,
);
state.validators_mut().push(validator)?;
// state balances is set to 0 in electra
state.balances_mut().push(0)?;
} else {
(
std::cmp::min(
let validator = Validator {
pubkey: deposit_data.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: deposit_data.withdrawal_credentials,
activation_eligibility_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
activation_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
exit_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
withdrawable_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
effective_balance: std::cmp::min(
amount.safe_sub(amount.safe_rem(spec.effective_balance_increment)?)?,
spec.max_effective_balance,
),
amount,
)
slashed: false,
};
state.validators_mut().push(validator)?;
// state balances is set to 0 in electra
state.balances_mut().push(amount)?;
};
// Create a new validator.
let validator = Validator {
pubkey: deposit_data.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: deposit_data.withdrawal_credentials,
activation_eligibility_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
activation_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
exit_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
withdrawable_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
effective_balance,
slashed: false,
};
state.validators_mut().push(validator)?;
state.balances_mut().push(state_balance)?;
// Altair or later initializations.
if let Ok(previous_epoch_participation) = state.previous_epoch_participation_mut() {
@@ -503,10 +530,18 @@ pub fn apply_deposit<E: EthSpec>(
}
// [New in Electra:EIP7251]
if let Ok(pending_balance_deposits) = state.pending_balance_deposits_mut() {
pending_balance_deposits.push(PendingBalanceDeposit {
index: new_validator_index as u64,
if let Ok(pending_deposits) = state.pending_deposits_mut() {
pending_deposits.push(PendingDeposit {
pubkey: deposit_data.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: deposit_data.withdrawal_credentials,
amount,
signature: deposit_data.signature.decompress().map_err(|_| {
BlockProcessingError::DepositInvalid {
index: deposit_index,
reason: DepositInvalid::BadBlsBytes,
}
})?,
slot: spec.genesis_slot, // Use `genesis_slot` to distinguish from a pending deposit request
})?;
}
}
@@ -620,13 +655,18 @@ pub fn process_deposit_requests<E: EthSpec>(
if state.deposit_requests_start_index()? == spec.unset_deposit_requests_start_index {
*state.deposit_requests_start_index_mut()? = request.index
}
let deposit_data = DepositData {
pubkey: request.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: request.withdrawal_credentials,
amount: request.amount,
signature: request.signature.clone().into(),
};
apply_deposit(state, deposit_data, None, false, spec)?
let slot = state.slot();
// [New in Electra:EIP7251]
if let Ok(pending_deposits) = state.pending_deposits_mut() {
pending_deposits.push(PendingDeposit {
pubkey: request.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: request.withdrawal_credentials,
amount: request.amount,
signature: request.signature.clone(),
slot,
})?;
}
}
Ok(())

View File

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ use crate::{
update_progressive_balances_cache::initialize_progressive_balances_cache,
},
epoch_cache::{initialize_epoch_cache, PreEpochCache},
per_block_processing::is_valid_deposit_signature,
per_epoch_processing::{Delta, Error, ParticipationEpochSummary},
};
use itertools::izip;
@@ -16,9 +17,9 @@ use types::{
TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX, WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR,
},
milhouse::Cow,
ActivationQueue, BeaconState, BeaconStateError, ChainSpec, Checkpoint, Epoch, EthSpec,
ExitCache, ForkName, List, ParticipationFlags, PendingBalanceDeposit, ProgressiveBalancesCache,
RelativeEpoch, Unsigned, Validator,
ActivationQueue, BeaconState, BeaconStateError, ChainSpec, Checkpoint, DepositData, Epoch,
EthSpec, ExitCache, ForkName, List, ParticipationFlags, PendingDeposit,
ProgressiveBalancesCache, RelativeEpoch, Unsigned, Validator,
};
pub struct SinglePassConfig {
@@ -26,7 +27,7 @@ pub struct SinglePassConfig {
pub rewards_and_penalties: bool,
pub registry_updates: bool,
pub slashings: bool,
pub pending_balance_deposits: bool,
pub pending_deposits: bool,
pub pending_consolidations: bool,
pub effective_balance_updates: bool,
}
@@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ impl SinglePassConfig {
rewards_and_penalties: true,
registry_updates: true,
slashings: true,
pending_balance_deposits: true,
pending_deposits: true,
pending_consolidations: true,
effective_balance_updates: true,
}
@@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ impl SinglePassConfig {
rewards_and_penalties: false,
registry_updates: false,
slashings: false,
pending_balance_deposits: false,
pending_deposits: false,
pending_consolidations: false,
effective_balance_updates: false,
}
@@ -85,15 +86,17 @@ struct SlashingsContext {
penalty_per_effective_balance_increment: u64,
}
struct PendingBalanceDepositsContext {
struct PendingDepositsContext {
/// The value to set `next_deposit_index` to *after* processing completes.
next_deposit_index: usize,
/// The value to set `deposit_balance_to_consume` to *after* processing completes.
deposit_balance_to_consume: u64,
/// Total balance increases for each validator due to pending balance deposits.
validator_deposits_to_process: HashMap<usize, u64>,
/// The deposits to append to `pending_balance_deposits` after processing all applicable deposits.
deposits_to_postpone: Vec<PendingBalanceDeposit>,
/// The deposits to append to `pending_deposits` after processing all applicable deposits.
deposits_to_postpone: Vec<PendingDeposit>,
/// New validators to be added to the state *after* processing completes.
new_validator_deposits: Vec<PendingDeposit>,
}
struct EffectiveBalancesContext {
@@ -138,6 +141,7 @@ pub fn process_epoch_single_pass<E: EthSpec>(
state.build_exit_cache(spec)?;
state.build_committee_cache(RelativeEpoch::Previous, spec)?;
state.build_committee_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
state.update_pubkey_cache()?;
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch();
let current_epoch = state.current_epoch();
@@ -163,12 +167,11 @@ pub fn process_epoch_single_pass<E: EthSpec>(
let slashings_ctxt = &SlashingsContext::new(state, state_ctxt, spec)?;
let mut next_epoch_cache = PreEpochCache::new_for_next_epoch(state)?;
let pending_balance_deposits_ctxt =
if fork_name.electra_enabled() && conf.pending_balance_deposits {
Some(PendingBalanceDepositsContext::new(state, spec)?)
} else {
None
};
let pending_deposits_ctxt = if fork_name.electra_enabled() && conf.pending_deposits {
Some(PendingDepositsContext::new(state, spec)?)
} else {
None
};
let mut earliest_exit_epoch = state.earliest_exit_epoch().ok();
let mut exit_balance_to_consume = state.exit_balance_to_consume().ok();
@@ -303,9 +306,9 @@ pub fn process_epoch_single_pass<E: EthSpec>(
process_single_slashing(&mut balance, &validator, slashings_ctxt, state_ctxt, spec)?;
}
// `process_pending_balance_deposits`
if let Some(pending_balance_deposits_ctxt) = &pending_balance_deposits_ctxt {
process_pending_balance_deposits_for_validator(
// `process_pending_deposits`
if let Some(pending_balance_deposits_ctxt) = &pending_deposits_ctxt {
process_pending_deposits_for_validator(
&mut balance,
validator_info,
pending_balance_deposits_ctxt,
@@ -342,20 +345,66 @@ pub fn process_epoch_single_pass<E: EthSpec>(
// Finish processing pending balance deposits if relevant.
//
// This *could* be reordered after `process_pending_consolidations` which pushes only to the end
// of the `pending_balance_deposits` list. But we may as well preserve the write ordering used
// of the `pending_deposits` list. But we may as well preserve the write ordering used
// by the spec and do this first.
if let Some(ctxt) = pending_balance_deposits_ctxt {
let mut new_pending_balance_deposits = List::try_from_iter(
if let Some(ctxt) = pending_deposits_ctxt {
let mut new_balance_deposits = List::try_from_iter(
state
.pending_balance_deposits()?
.pending_deposits()?
.iter_from(ctxt.next_deposit_index)?
.cloned(),
)?;
for deposit in ctxt.deposits_to_postpone {
new_pending_balance_deposits.push(deposit)?;
new_balance_deposits.push(deposit)?;
}
*state.pending_balance_deposits_mut()? = new_pending_balance_deposits;
*state.pending_deposits_mut()? = new_balance_deposits;
*state.deposit_balance_to_consume_mut()? = ctxt.deposit_balance_to_consume;
// Apply the new deposits to the state
for deposit in ctxt.new_validator_deposits.into_iter() {
if is_valid_deposit_signature(
&DepositData {
pubkey: deposit.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: deposit.withdrawal_credentials,
amount: deposit.amount,
signature: deposit.signature.into(),
},
spec,
)
.is_ok()
{
let mut validator = Validator {
pubkey: deposit.pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials: deposit.withdrawal_credentials,
activation_eligibility_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
activation_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
exit_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
withdrawable_epoch: spec.far_future_epoch,
effective_balance: 0,
slashed: false,
};
let amount = deposit.amount;
let max_effective_balance =
validator.get_max_effective_balance(spec, state.fork_name_unchecked());
validator.effective_balance = std::cmp::min(
amount.safe_sub(amount.safe_rem(spec.effective_balance_increment)?)?,
max_effective_balance,
);
state.validators_mut().push(validator)?;
state.balances_mut().push(amount)?;
// Altair or later initializations.
if let Ok(previous_epoch_participation) = state.previous_epoch_participation_mut() {
previous_epoch_participation.push(ParticipationFlags::default())?;
}
if let Ok(current_epoch_participation) = state.current_epoch_participation_mut() {
current_epoch_participation.push(ParticipationFlags::default())?;
}
if let Ok(inactivity_scores) = state.inactivity_scores_mut() {
inactivity_scores.push(0)?;
}
}
}
}
// Process consolidations outside the single-pass loop, as they depend on balances for multiple
@@ -819,7 +868,7 @@ fn process_single_slashing(
Ok(())
}
impl PendingBalanceDepositsContext {
impl PendingDepositsContext {
fn new<E: EthSpec>(state: &BeaconState<E>, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<Self, Error> {
let available_for_processing = state
.deposit_balance_to_consume()?
@@ -830,10 +879,31 @@ impl PendingBalanceDepositsContext {
let mut next_deposit_index = 0;
let mut validator_deposits_to_process = HashMap::new();
let mut deposits_to_postpone = vec![];
let mut new_validator_deposits = vec![];
let mut is_churn_limit_reached = false;
let finalized_slot = state
.finalized_checkpoint()
.epoch
.start_slot(E::slots_per_epoch());
let pending_balance_deposits = state.pending_balance_deposits()?;
let pending_deposits = state.pending_deposits()?;
for deposit in pending_balance_deposits.iter() {
for deposit in pending_deposits.iter() {
// Do not process deposit requests if the Eth1 bridge deposits are not yet applied.
if deposit.slot > spec.genesis_slot
&& state.eth1_deposit_index() < state.deposit_requests_start_index()?
{
break;
}
// Do not process is deposit slot has not been finalized.
if deposit.slot > finalized_slot {
break;
}
// Do not process if we have reached the limit for the number of deposits
// processed in an epoch.
if next_deposit_index >= E::max_pending_deposits_per_epoch() {
break;
}
// We have to do a bit of indexing into `validators` here, but I can't see any way
// around that without changing the spec.
//
@@ -844,48 +914,71 @@ impl PendingBalanceDepositsContext {
// take, just whether it is non-default. Nor do we need to know the value of
// `withdrawable_epoch`, because `next_epoch <= withdrawable_epoch` will evaluate to
// `true` both for the actual value & the default placeholder value (`FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH`).
let validator = state.get_validator(deposit.index as usize)?;
let already_exited = validator.exit_epoch < spec.far_future_epoch;
// In the spec process_registry_updates is called before process_pending_balance_deposits
// so we must account for process_registry_updates ejecting the validator for low balance
// and setting the exit_epoch to < far_future_epoch. Note that in the spec the effective
// balance update does not happen until *after* the registry update, so we don't need to
// account for changes to the effective balance that would push it below the ejection
// balance here.
let will_be_exited = validator.is_active_at(current_epoch)
&& validator.effective_balance <= spec.ejection_balance;
if already_exited || will_be_exited {
if next_epoch <= validator.withdrawable_epoch {
deposits_to_postpone.push(deposit.clone());
} else {
// Deposited balance will never become active. Increase balance but do not
// consume churn.
let mut is_validator_exited = false;
let mut is_validator_withdrawn = false;
if let Some(validator_index) = state.pubkey_cache().get(&deposit.pubkey) {
let validator = state.get_validator(validator_index)?;
let already_exited = validator.exit_epoch < spec.far_future_epoch;
// In the spec process_registry_updates is called before process_pending_deposits
// so we must account for process_registry_updates ejecting the validator for low balance
// and setting the exit_epoch to < far_future_epoch. Note that in the spec the effective
// balance update does not happen until *after* the registry update, so we don't need to
// account for changes to the effective balance that would push it below the ejection
// balance here.
let will_be_exited = validator.is_active_at(current_epoch)
&& validator.effective_balance <= spec.ejection_balance;
is_validator_exited = already_exited || will_be_exited;
is_validator_withdrawn = validator.withdrawable_epoch < next_epoch;
}
if is_validator_withdrawn {
// Deposited balance will never become active. Queue a balance increase
// but do not consume churn
if let Some(validator_index) = state.pubkey_cache().get(&deposit.pubkey) {
validator_deposits_to_process
.entry(deposit.index as usize)
.entry(validator_index)
.or_insert(0)
.safe_add_assign(deposit.amount)?;
} else {
// The `PendingDeposit` is for a new validator
// We add the new validator to the state at the end of all processing.
// Note that the new validator will not be eligible for activation until
// next epoch, so none of the operations will affect a newly added validator.
new_validator_deposits.push(deposit.clone());
}
} else if is_validator_exited {
// Validator is exiting, postpone the deposit until after withdrawable epoch
deposits_to_postpone.push(deposit.clone());
} else {
// Deposit does not fit in the churn, no more deposit processing in this epoch.
if processed_amount.safe_add(deposit.amount)? > available_for_processing {
// Check if deposit fits in the churn, otherwise, do no more deposit processing in this epoch.
is_churn_limit_reached =
processed_amount.safe_add(deposit.amount)? > available_for_processing;
if is_churn_limit_reached {
break;
}
// Deposit fits in the churn, process it. Increase balance and consume churn.
validator_deposits_to_process
.entry(deposit.index as usize)
.or_insert(0)
.safe_add_assign(deposit.amount)?;
processed_amount.safe_add_assign(deposit.amount)?;
// Deposit fits in the churn, process it. Increase balance and consume churn.
if let Some(validator_index) = state.pubkey_cache().get(&deposit.pubkey) {
validator_deposits_to_process
.entry(validator_index)
.or_insert(0)
.safe_add_assign(deposit.amount)?;
} else {
// The `PendingDeposit` is for a new validator
new_validator_deposits.push(deposit.clone());
}
}
// Regardless of how the deposit was handled, we move on in the queue.
next_deposit_index.safe_add_assign(1)?;
}
let deposit_balance_to_consume = if next_deposit_index == pending_balance_deposits.len() {
0
} else {
// Accumulate churn only if the churn limit has been hit.
let deposit_balance_to_consume = if is_churn_limit_reached {
available_for_processing.safe_sub(processed_amount)?
} else {
0
};
Ok(Self {
@@ -893,14 +986,15 @@ impl PendingBalanceDepositsContext {
deposit_balance_to_consume,
validator_deposits_to_process,
deposits_to_postpone,
new_validator_deposits,
})
}
}
fn process_pending_balance_deposits_for_validator(
fn process_pending_deposits_for_validator(
balance: &mut Cow<u64>,
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
pending_balance_deposits_ctxt: &PendingBalanceDepositsContext,
pending_balance_deposits_ctxt: &PendingDepositsContext,
) -> Result<(), Error> {
if let Some(deposit_amount) = pending_balance_deposits_ctxt
.validator_deposits_to_process

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
use bls::Signature;
use safe_arith::SafeArith;
use std::mem;
use types::{
BeaconState, BeaconStateElectra, BeaconStateError as Error, ChainSpec, Epoch, EpochCache,
EthSpec, Fork, PendingBalanceDeposit,
EthSpec, Fork, PendingDeposit,
};
/// Transform a `Deneb` state into an `Electra` state.
@@ -70,11 +71,16 @@ pub fn upgrade_to_electra<E: EthSpec>(
.ok_or(Error::UnknownValidator(index))?;
validator.effective_balance = 0;
validator.activation_eligibility_epoch = spec.far_future_epoch;
let pubkey = validator.pubkey;
let withdrawal_credentials = validator.withdrawal_credentials;
post.pending_balance_deposits_mut()?
.push(PendingBalanceDeposit {
index: index as u64,
post.pending_deposits_mut()?
.push(PendingDeposit {
pubkey,
withdrawal_credentials,
amount: balance_copy,
signature: Signature::infinity()?,
slot: spec.genesis_slot,
})
.map_err(Error::MilhouseError)?;
}
@@ -156,7 +162,7 @@ pub fn upgrade_state_to_electra<E: EthSpec>(
earliest_exit_epoch,
consolidation_balance_to_consume: 0,
earliest_consolidation_epoch,
pending_balance_deposits: Default::default(),
pending_deposits: Default::default(),
pending_partial_withdrawals: Default::default(),
pending_consolidations: Default::default(),
// Caches