Move the BeaconProcessor into a new crate (#4435)

*Replaces #4434. It is identical, but this PR has a smaller diff due to a curated commit history.*

## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

This PR moves the scheduling logic for the `BeaconProcessor` into a new crate in `beacon_node/beacon_processor`. Previously it existed in the `beacon_node/network` crate.

This addresses a circular-dependency problem where it's not possible to use the `BeaconProcessor` from the `beacon_chain` crate. The `network` crate depends on the `beacon_chain` crate (`network -> beacon_chain`), but importing the `BeaconProcessor` into the `beacon_chain` crate would create a circular dependancy of `beacon_chain -> network`.

The `BeaconProcessor` was designed to provide queuing and prioritized scheduling for messages from the network. It has proven to be quite valuable and I believe we'd make Lighthouse more stable and effective by using it elsewhere. In particular, I think we should use the `BeaconProcessor` for:

1. HTTP API requests.
1. Scheduled tasks in the `BeaconChain` (e.g., state advance).

Using the `BeaconProcessor` for these tasks would help prevent the BN from becoming overwhelmed and would also help it to prioritize operations (e.g., choosing to process blocks from gossip before responding to low-priority HTTP API requests).

## Additional Info

This PR is intended to have zero impact on runtime behaviour. It aims to simply separate the *scheduling* code (i.e., the `BeaconProcessor`) from the *business logic* in the `network` crate (i.e., the `Worker` impls). Future PRs (see #4462) can build upon these works to actually use the `BeaconProcessor` for more operations.

I've gone to some effort to use `git mv` to make the diff look more like "file was moved and modified" rather than "file was deleted and a new one added". This should reduce review burden and help maintain commit attribution.
This commit is contained in:
Paul Hauner
2023-07-10 07:45:54 +00:00
parent ea2420d193
commit c25825a539
28 changed files with 1743 additions and 1674 deletions

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
//! If a batch fails, the backfill sync cannot progress. In this scenario, we mark the backfill
//! sync as failed, log an error and attempt to retry once a new peer joins the node.
use crate::beacon_processor::{ChainSegmentProcessId, WorkEvent as BeaconWorkEvent};
use crate::network_beacon_processor::ChainSegmentProcessId;
use crate::sync::manager::{BatchProcessResult, Id};
use crate::sync::network_context::SyncNetworkContext;
use crate::sync::range_sync::{
@@ -537,8 +537,8 @@ impl<T: BeaconChainTypes> BackFillSync<T> {
self.current_processing_batch = Some(batch_id);
if let Err(e) = network
.processor_channel()
.try_send(BeaconWorkEvent::chain_segment(process_id, blocks))
.beacon_processor()
.send_chain_segment(process_id, blocks)
{
crit!(self.log, "Failed to send backfill segment to processor."; "msg" => "process_batch",
"error" => %e, "batch" => self.processing_target);