mirror of
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git
synced 2026-04-17 12:58:31 +00:00
Relax PartialEq constraint on error enums (#1179)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -317,21 +317,22 @@ fn epoch_boundary_state_attestation_processing() {
|
||||
.verify_unaggregated_attestation_for_gossip(attestation.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
let current_slot = harness.chain.slot().expect("should get slot");
|
||||
let attestation_slot = attestation.data.slot;
|
||||
let expected_attestation_slot = attestation.data.slot;
|
||||
// Extra -1 to handle gossip clock disparity.
|
||||
let earliest_permissible_slot = current_slot - E::slots_per_epoch() - 1;
|
||||
let expected_earliest_permissible_slot = current_slot - E::slots_per_epoch() - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if attestation_slot <= finalized_epoch.start_slot(E::slots_per_epoch())
|
||||
|| attestation_slot < earliest_permissible_slot
|
||||
if expected_attestation_slot <= finalized_epoch.start_slot(E::slots_per_epoch())
|
||||
|| expected_attestation_slot < expected_earliest_permissible_slot
|
||||
{
|
||||
checked_pre_fin = true;
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
res.err().unwrap(),
|
||||
AttnError::PastSlot {
|
||||
attestation_slot,
|
||||
earliest_permissible_slot,
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
if attestation_slot == expected_attestation_slot && earliest_permissible_slot == expected_earliest_permissible_slot
|
||||
));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
res.expect("should have verified attetation");
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -397,13 +398,13 @@ fn delete_blocks_and_states() {
|
||||
// Delete faulty fork
|
||||
// Attempting to load those states should find them unavailable
|
||||
for (state_root, slot) in &states_to_delete {
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.delete_state(state_root, *slot), Ok(()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.get_state(state_root, Some(*slot)), Ok(None));
|
||||
store.delete_state(state_root, *slot).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.get_state(state_root, Some(*slot)).unwrap(), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Double-deleting should also be OK (deleting non-existent things is fine)
|
||||
for (state_root, slot) in &states_to_delete {
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.delete_state(state_root, *slot), Ok(()));
|
||||
store.delete_state(state_root, *slot).unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Deleting the blocks from the fork should remove them completely
|
||||
@@ -413,8 +414,8 @@ fn delete_blocks_and_states() {
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
|
||||
for (block_root, _) in blocks_to_delete {
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.delete_block(&block_root), Ok(()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.get_block(&block_root), Ok(None));
|
||||
store.delete_block(&block_root).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.get_block(&block_root).unwrap(), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Deleting frozen states should do nothing
|
||||
@@ -426,7 +427,7 @@ fn delete_blocks_and_states() {
|
||||
.filter(|(_, slot)| *slot < split_slot);
|
||||
|
||||
for (state_root, slot) in finalized_states {
|
||||
assert_eq!(store.delete_state(&state_root, slot), Ok(()));
|
||||
store.delete_state(&state_root, slot).unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// After all that, the chain dump should still be OK
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user