N/A
Adds lints for rust 1.95. Mostly cosmetic.
1. .zip(a.into_iter()) -> .zip(a) . Also a few more places where into_iter is not required
2. replace sort_by with sort_by_key
3. move if statements inside match block.
4. use checked_div instead of if statements. I think this is debatable in terms of being better, happy to remove it if others also feel its unnecessary
Co-Authored-By: Pawan Dhananjay <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
#9077
Where possible replaces all instances of `validator_monitor::timestamp_now` with `chain.slot_clock.now_duration().unwrap_or_default()`.
Where chain/slot_clock is not available, instead replace it with a convenience function `slot_clock::timestamp_now`.
Remove the `validator_monitor::timestamp_now` function.
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
Which issue # does this PR address?
None
All of these are performing a check, and adding a batch, or creating a new lookup, or a new query, etc..
Hence all of these limits would be off by one.
Example:
```rust
// BACKFILL_BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE = 5
if self.batches.iter().filter(...).count() >= BACKFILL_BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE {
return None; // ← REJECT
}
// ... later adds batch via Entry::Vacant(entry).insert(...)
```
Without the `>` being changed to a `>=` , we would allow 6. The same idea applies to all changes proposed.
Co-Authored-By: Antoine James <antoine@ethereum.org>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jchen.tc@gmail.com>
N/A
Another find by @gitToki. Sort the preferred_ids in descending order as originally intended from the comment in the function.
Co-Authored-By: Pawan Dhananjay <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
- Step 0 of the tree-sync roadmap https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/7678
Current lookup sync tests are written in an explicit way that assume how the internals of lookup sync work. For example the test would do:
- Emit unknown block parent message
- Expect block request for X
- Respond with successful block request
- Expect block processing request for X
- Response with successful processing request
- etc..
This is unnecessarily verbose. And it will requires a complete re-write when something changes in the internals of lookup sync (has happened a few times, mostly for deneb and fulu).
What we really want to assert is:
- WHEN: we receive an unknown block parent message
- THEN: Lookup sync can sync that block
- ASSERT: Without penalizing peers, without unnecessary retries
Keep all existing tests and add new cases but written in the new style described above. The logic to serve and respond to request is in this function `fn simulate` 2288a3aeb1/beacon_node/network/src/sync/tests/lookups.rs (L301)
- It controls peer behavior based on a `CompleteStrategy` where you can set for example "respond to BlocksByRoot requests with empty"
- It actually runs beacon processor messages running their clousures. Now sync tests actually import blocks, increasing the test coverage to the interaction of sync and the da_checker.
- To achieve the above the tests create real blocks with the test harness. To make the tests as fast as before, I disabled crypto with `TestConfig`
Along the way I found a couple bugs, which I documented on the diff.
Co-Authored-By: dapplion <35266934+dapplion@users.noreply.github.com>
Add error rates metrics on unstable to benchmark against tree-sync. In my branch there are frequent errors but mostly connections errors as the node is still finding it set of stable peers.
These metrics are very useful and unstable can benefit from them ahead of tree-sync
Add three new metrics:
- sync_rpc_requests_success_total: Total count of sync RPC requests successes
- sync_rpc_requests_error_total: Total count of sync RPC requests errors
- sync_rpc_request_duration_sec: Time to complete a successful sync RPC requesst
Co-Authored-By: dapplion <35266934+dapplion@users.noreply.github.com>
Just visual clean-up, making logging statements look uniform. There's no reason to use `tracing::debug` instead of `debug`. If we ever need to migrate our logging lib in the future it would make things easier too.
Co-Authored-By: dapplion <35266934+dapplion@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jchen.tc@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michaelsproul@users.noreply.github.com>
Which issue # does this PR address?
None
The `visualize_batch_state` functions uses the following loop `for mut batch_index in 0..BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE`, making it from `0` to `BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE - 1` (behind the scenes).
Hence we would never hit the following condition:
```rust
if batch_index != BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE {
visualization_string.push(',');
}
```
Replacing `!=` with `<` & `BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE -1` allows for the following change:
`[A,B,C,D,E,]` to become: `[A,B,C,D,E]`
Co-Authored-By: Antoine James <antoine@ethereum.org>
