gnosis/lighthouse
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git synced 2026-04-27 01:33:33 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
6,537 Commits 52 Branches 142 Tags
2aaf9b5dbe9a3a664e0f2c39a6023c11e8b46e38
Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Knopik
8b085dd167 Fix phase0 block reward in rewards API (#5101) 
* Added Block Rewards

* added new type

* added enum

* Fix phase0 block reward in rewards API (#4929)

* Merge 'guav00a/proposer-rewards-api'

* Merge unstable

* Revamp phase0 reward API tests

- Add test_rewards_base_slashings (testing #5101)
- Improve fix to not include proposer reward in attestation reward API calculation (#4856)
- Adjust test approach for phase0 tests: Pad with empty epochs to include all rewards in calculation
- Simplify and unify code across all reward tests

* Merge branch 'unstable' into fix-4929

* Merge branch 'unstable' into fix-4929

* Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into fix-4929

* Fix merge fallout

* Remove junk revived in merge

* Address review

- check for attestations with lower inclusion delay
- check for double attestations in block
- add test

* Merge branch 'unstable' into fix-4929

* Merge branch 'unstable' into fix-4929
 2024-09-17 06:45:02 +00:00
Mac L
13f94ef0f3 Rename Merge to Bellatrix (#5601) 
* Rename Merge to Bellatrix

* Remove tree-hash-cache which got readded from the rebase
 2024-04-25 20:19:41 +00:00
Michael Sproul
feb531f85b Single-pass epoch processing and optimised block processing (#5279) 
* Single-pass epoch processing (#4483, #4573)

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>

* Delete unused epoch processing code (#5170)

* Delete unused epoch processing code

* Compare total deltas

* Remove unnecessary apply_pending

* cargo fmt

* Remove newline

* Use epoch cache in block packing (#5223)

* Remove progressive balances mode (#5224)

* inline inactivity_penalty_quotient_for_state

* drop previous_epoch_total_active_balance

* fc lint

* spec compliant process_sync_aggregate (#15)

* spec compliant process_sync_aggregate

* Update consensus/state_processing/src/per_block_processing/altair/sync_committee.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Delete the participation cache (#16)

* update help

* Fix op_pool tests

* Fix fork choice tests

* Merge remote-tracking branch 'sigp/unstable' into epoch-single-pass

* Simplify exit cache (#5280)

* Fix clippy on exit cache

* Clean up single-pass a bit (#5282)

* Address Mark's review of single-pass (#5386)

* Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into epoch-single-pass

* Address Sean's review comments (#5414)

* Address most of Sean's review comments

* Simplify total balance cache building

* Clean up unused junk

* Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into epoch-single-pass

* More self-review

* Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into epoch-single-pass

* Merge branch 'unstable' into epoch-single-pass

* Fix imports for beta compiler

* Fix tests, probably
 2024-04-04 13:14:36 +00:00
Mac L
f8fdb71f50 Add Electra fork boilerplate (#5122) 
* Add Electra fork boilerplate

* Remove electra from spec tests

* Fix tests

* Remove sneaky log file

* Fix more tests

* Fix even more tests and add suggestions

* Remove unrelated lcli addition

* Update more tests

* Merge branch 'unstable' into electra

* Add comment for test-suite lcli override

* Merge branch 'unstable' into electra

* Cleanup

* Merge branch 'unstable' into electra

* Apply suggestions

* Merge branch 'unstable' into electra

* Merge sigp/unstable into electra

* Merge branch 'unstable' into electra
 2024-04-02 12:35:02 +00:00
Zackary Scott
e181741d38 Fix for issue 4860 - Added in process_justification_and_finalization (#4877) 
* Added in process_justification_and_finalization

Added in process_justification_and_finalization to compute_attestation_rewards_altair to take into account justified attestations when coming out of inactivity leak. Also added in test to check for this edge case.

* Added in justification and finalization for compute_attestation_rewards_base

* Added in test for altair rewards without inactivity leak
 2023-11-16 22:07:48 +11:00
Zackary Scott
b11988223f #4512 inactivity calculation for Altair (#4807) 
## Issue Addressed
#4512 
Which issue # does this PR address?

## Proposed Changes
Add inactivity calculation for Altair

Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.
Add inactivity calculation for Altair

## Additional Info

Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.


Co-authored-by: Jimmy Chen <jchen.tc@gmail.com>
 2023-10-20 06:23:28 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
ec416df061 Merge branch 'unstable' into merge-unstable-to-deneb-20230808 
# Conflicts:
#	Cargo.lock
#	beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/lib.rs
#	beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api.rs
#	beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/http.rs
#	beacon_node/execution_layer/src/test_utils/mod.rs
#	beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/rpc/codec/ssz_snappy.rs
#	beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/rpc/handler.rs
#	beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/rpc/protocol.rs
#	beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/service/utils.rs
#	beacon_node/lighthouse_network/tests/rpc_tests.rs
#	beacon_node/network/Cargo.toml
#	beacon_node/network/src/network_beacon_processor/tests.rs
#	lcli/src/parse_ssz.rs
#	scripts/cross/Dockerfile
#	validator_client/src/block_service.rs
#	validator_client/src/validator_store.rs
 2023-08-08 17:02:51 +10:00
Jimmy Chen
b5337c0ea5 Fix incorrect ideal rewards calculation (#4520) 
## Issue Addressed

The PR fixes a bug where the the ideal rewards for source and head were incorrectly set.

Output from testing a validator that performed optimally in a Phase 0 epoch , note the `source` and `target` under ideal rewards is incorrect (compared to the actual `total_rewards` below):

```json
{ 
   "ideal_rewards": [
    ...
      {
        "effective_balance": "32000000000",
        "head": "18771",
        "target": "18770",
        "source": "18729",
        "inclusion_delay": "17083",
        "inactivity": "0"
      }
    ],
    "total_rewards": [
      {
        "validator_index": "0",
        "head": "18729",
        "target": "18770",
        "source": "18771",
        "inclusion_delay": "17083",
        "inactivity": "0"
      }
    ]
```
 2023-07-31 01:53:06 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
54c6e1dd3d Fix compilation 2023-07-24 21:09:07 +10:00
Jimmy Chen
fc7f1ba6b9 Phase 0 attestation rewards via Beacon API (#4474) 
## Issue Addressed

Addresses #4026.

Beacon-API spec [here](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Beacon/getAttestationsRewards).

Endpoint: `POST /eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

This endpoint already supports post-Altair epochs. This PR adds support for phase 0 rewards calculation.

## Proposed Changes

- [x] Attestation rewards API to support phase 0 rewards calculation, re-using logic from `state_processing`. Refactored `get_attestation_deltas` slightly to support computing deltas for a subset of validators.
- [x] Add `inclusion_delay` to `ideal_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add `inactivity` penalties to both `ideal_rewards` and `total_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add tests to compute attestation rewards and compare results with beacon states 

## Additional Notes

- The extra penalty for missing attestations or being slashed during an inactivity leak is currently not included in the API response (for both phase 0 and Altair) in the spec. 
- I went with adding `inactivity` as a separate component rather than combining them with the 4 rewards, because this is how it was grouped in [the phase 0 spec](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/beacon-chain.md#get_attestation_deltas). During inactivity leak, all rewards include the optimal reward, and inactivity penalties are calculated separately (see below code snippet from the spec), so it would be quite confusing if we merge them. This would also work better with Altair, because there's no "cancelling" of rewards and inactivity penalties are more separate.
- Altair calculation logic (to include inactivity penalties) to be updated in a follow-up PR.

```python
def get_attestation_deltas(state: BeaconState) -> Tuple[Sequence[Gwei], Sequence[Gwei]]:
    """
    Return attestation reward/penalty deltas for each validator.
    """
    source_rewards, source_penalties = get_source_deltas(state)
    target_rewards, target_penalties = get_target_deltas(state)
    head_rewards, head_penalties = get_head_deltas(state)
    inclusion_delay_rewards, _ = get_inclusion_delay_deltas(state)
    _, inactivity_penalties = get_inactivity_penalty_deltas(state)

    rewards = [
        source_rewards[i] + target_rewards[i] + head_rewards[i] + inclusion_delay_rewards[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    penalties = [
        source_penalties[i] + target_penalties[i] + head_penalties[i] + inactivity_penalties[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    return rewards, penalties
```

## Example API Response

<details>
  <summary>Click me</summary>
  
```json
{
  "ideal_rewards": [
    {
      "effective_balance": "1000000000",
      "head": "6638",
      "target": "6638",
      "source": "6638",
      "inclusion_delay": "9783",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "2000000000",
      "head": "13276",
      "target": "13276",
      "source": "13276",
      "inclusion_delay": "19565",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "3000000000",
      "head": "19914",
      "target": "19914",
      "source": "19914",
      "inclusion_delay": "29349",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "4000000000",
      "head": "26553",
      "target": "26553",
      "source": "26553",
      "inclusion_delay": "39131",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "5000000000",
      "head": "33191",
      "target": "33191",
      "source": "33191",
      "inclusion_delay": "48914",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "6000000000",
      "head": "39829",
      "target": "39829",
      "source": "39829",
      "inclusion_delay": "58697",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "7000000000",
      "head": "46468",
      "target": "46468",
      "source": "46468",
      "inclusion_delay": "68480",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "8000000000",
      "head": "53106",
      "target": "53106",
      "source": "53106",
      "inclusion_delay": "78262",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "9000000000",
      "head": "59744",
      "target": "59744",
      "source": "59744",
      "inclusion_delay": "88046",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "10000000000",
      "head": "66383",
      "target": "66383",
      "source": "66383",
      "inclusion_delay": "97828",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "11000000000",
      "head": "73021",
      "target": "73021",
      "source": "73021",
      "inclusion_delay": "107611",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "12000000000",
      "head": "79659",
      "target": "79659",
      "source": "79659",
      "inclusion_delay": "117394",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "13000000000",
      "head": "86298",
      "target": "86298",
      "source": "86298",
      "inclusion_delay": "127176",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "14000000000",
      "head": "92936",
      "target": "92936",
      "source": "92936",
      "inclusion_delay": "136959",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "15000000000",
      "head": "99574",
      "target": "99574",
      "source": "99574",
      "inclusion_delay": "146742",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "16000000000",
      "head": "106212",
      "target": "106212",
      "source": "106212",
      "inclusion_delay": "156525",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "17000000000",
      "head": "112851",
      "target": "112851",
      "source": "112851",
      "inclusion_delay": "166307",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "18000000000",
      "head": "119489",
      "target": "119489",
      "source": "119489",
      "inclusion_delay": "176091",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "19000000000",
      "head": "126127",
      "target": "126127",
      "source": "126127",
      "inclusion_delay": "185873",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "20000000000",
      "head": "132766",
      "target": "132766",
      "source": "132766",
      "inclusion_delay": "195656",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "21000000000",
      "head": "139404",
      "target": "139404",
      "source": "139404",
      "inclusion_delay": "205439",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "22000000000",
      "head": "146042",
      "target": "146042",
      "source": "146042",
      "inclusion_delay": "215222",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "23000000000",
      "head": "152681",
      "target": "152681",
      "source": "152681",
      "inclusion_delay": "225004",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "24000000000",
      "head": "159319",
      "target": "159319",
      "source": "159319",
      "inclusion_delay": "234787",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "25000000000",
      "head": "165957",
      "target": "165957",
      "source": "165957",
      "inclusion_delay": "244570",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "26000000000",
      "head": "172596",
      "target": "172596",
      "source": "172596",
      "inclusion_delay": "254352",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "27000000000",
      "head": "179234",
      "target": "179234",
      "source": "179234",
      "inclusion_delay": "264136",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "28000000000",
      "head": "185872",
      "target": "185872",
      "source": "185872",
      "inclusion_delay": "273918",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "29000000000",
      "head": "192510",
      "target": "192510",
      "source": "192510",
      "inclusion_delay": "283701",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "30000000000",
      "head": "199149",
      "target": "199149",
      "source": "199149",
      "inclusion_delay": "293484",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "31000000000",
      "head": "205787",
      "target": "205787",
      "source": "205787",
      "inclusion_delay": "303267",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "32000000000",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ],
  "total_rewards": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "32",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "63",
      "head": "-357771",
      "target": "-357771",
      "source": "-357771",
      "inclusion_delay": "0",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ]
}
```
</details>
 2023-07-18 01:48:40 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
f2223feb21 Rust 1.71 lints (#4503) 
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Add lints for rust 1.71

[3789134](3789134ae2) is probably the one that needs most attention as it changes beacon state code. I changed the `is_in_inactivity_leak ` function to return a `ArithError` as not all consumers of that function work well with a `BeaconState::Error`.
 2023-07-17 00:14:19 +00:00
Michael Sproul
c9354a9d25 Tweaks to reward APIs (#3957) 
## Proposed Changes

* Return the effective balance in gwei to align with the spec ([ideal attestation rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards/getAttestationsRewards)).
* Use quoted `i64`s for attestation and sync committee rewards.
 2023-02-10 06:19:42 +00:00
kevinbogner
4d07e40501 Implement attestation_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3822) 
## Issue Addressed

#3661 

## Proposed Changes
`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

```json
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "ideal_rewards": [
        {
          "effective_balance": "1000000000",
          "head": "2500",
          "target": "5000",
          "source": "5000"
        }
      ],
      "total_rewards": [
        {
          "validator_index": "0",
          "head": "2000",
          "target": "2000",
          "source": "4000",
          "inclusion_delay": "2000"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
- [`sync_committee_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3790)
- `attestation_rewards`
- `block_rewards`.

This PR *only* implements the `attestation_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards

## Additional Info
The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

---
- [x] `get_state`
- [x] Calculate *ideal rewards* with some logic from  `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Calculate *actual rewards*  with some logic from `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Code cleanup
- [x] Testing
 2023-02-07 00:00:19 +00:00