mirror of
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git
synced 2026-03-15 19:02:42 +00:00
55951bb45fc3a8b58ea67ea96cce4e98bc5e0b20
7 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
chonghe
|
522bd9e9c6 |
Update Rust Edition to 2024 (#7766)
* #7749 Thanks @dknopik and @michaelsproul for your help! |
||
|
Eitan Seri-Levi
|
6786b9d12a |
Single attestation "Full" implementation (#7444)
#6970 This allows for us to receive `SingleAttestation` over gossip and process it without converting. There is still a conversion to `Attestation` as a final step in the attestation verification process, but by then the `SingleAttestation` is fully verified. I've also fully removed the `submitPoolAttestationsV1` endpoint as its been deprecated I've also pre-emptively deprecated supporting `Attestation` in `submitPoolAttestationsV2` endpoint. See here for more info: https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/pull/531 I tried to the minimize the diff here by only making the "required" changes. There are some unnecessary complexities with the way we manage the different attestation verification wrapper types. We could probably consolidate this to one wrapper type and refactor this even further. We could leave that to a separate PR if we feel like cleaning things up in the future. Note that I've also updated the test harness to always submit `SingleAttestation` regardless of fork variant. I don't see a problem in that approach and it allows us to delete more code :) |
||
|
Lion - dapplion
|
b949db0a8b |
Remove timeout locks (#6048)
* Remove locks with timeouts * Readd test * Update docs * Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into pk-cache-timeout |
||
|
ethDreamer
|
c52c598f69 |
Electra: Remaining Consensus Data Structures (#5712)
* Attestation superstruct changes for EIP 7549 (#5644)
* update
* experiment
* superstruct changes
* revert
* superstruct changes
* fix tests
* indexed attestation
* indexed attestation superstruct
* updated TODOs
* `superstruct` the `AttesterSlashing` (#5636)
* `superstruct` Attester Fork Variants
* Push a little further
* Deal with Encode / Decode of AttesterSlashing
* not so sure about this..
* Stop Encode/Decode Bounds from Propagating Out
* Tons of Changes..
* More Conversions to AttestationRef
* Add AsReference trait (#15)
* Add AsReference trait
* Fix some snafus
* Got it Compiling! :D
* Got Tests Building
* Get beacon chain tests compiling
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
* Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/unstable' into electra_attestation_changes
* Make EF Tests Fork-Agnostic (#5713)
* Finish EF Test Fork Agnostic (#5714)
* Superstruct `AggregateAndProof` (#5715)
* Upgrade `superstruct` to `0.8.0`
* superstruct `AggregateAndProof`
* Merge remote-tracking branch 'sigp/unstable' into electra_attestation_changes
* cargo fmt
* Merge pull request #5726 from realbigsean/electra_attestation_changes
Merge unstable into Electra attestation changes
* EIP7549 `get_attestation_indices` (#5657)
* get attesting indices electra impl
* fmt
* get tests to pass
* fmt
* fix some beacon chain tests
* fmt
* fix slasher test
* fmt got me again
* fix more tests
* fix tests
* Some small changes (#5739)
* cargo fmt (#5740)
* Sketch op pool changes
* fix get attesting indices (#5742)
* fix get attesting indices
* better errors
* fix compile
* only get committee index once
* Ef test fixes (#5753)
* attestation related ef test fixes
* delete commented out stuff
* Fix Aggregation Pool for Electra (#5754)
* Fix Aggregation Pool for Electra
* Remove Outdated Interface
* fix ssz (#5755)
* Get `electra_op_pool` up to date (#5756)
* fix get attesting indices (#5742)
* fix get attesting indices
* better errors
* fix compile
* only get committee index once
* Ef test fixes (#5753)
* attestation related ef test fixes
* delete commented out stuff
* Fix Aggregation Pool for Electra (#5754)
* Fix Aggregation Pool for Electra
* Remove Outdated Interface
* fix ssz (#5755)
---------
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
* Revert "Get `electra_op_pool` up to date (#5756)" (#5757)
This reverts commit
|
||
|
Jimmy Chen
|
40abaefffb |
Attestation verification uses head state fork (#4263)
## Issue Addressed Addresses #4238 ## Proposed Changes - [x] Add tests for the scenarios - [x] Use the fork of the attestation slot for signature verification. |
||
|
Paul Hauner
|
be4e261e74 |
Use async code when interacting with EL (#3244)
## Overview
This rather extensive PR achieves two primary goals:
1. Uses the finalized/justified checkpoints of fork choice (FC), rather than that of the head state.
2. Refactors fork choice, block production and block processing to `async` functions.
Additionally, it achieves:
- Concurrent forkchoice updates to the EL and cache pruning after a new head is selected.
- Concurrent "block packing" (attestations, etc) and execution payload retrieval during block production.
- Concurrent per-block-processing and execution payload verification during block processing.
- The `Arc`-ification of `SignedBeaconBlock` during block processing (it's never mutated, so why not?):
- I had to do this to deal with sending blocks into spawned tasks.
- Previously we were cloning the beacon block at least 2 times during each block processing, these clones are either removed or turned into cheaper `Arc` clones.
- We were also `Box`-ing and un-`Box`-ing beacon blocks as they moved throughout the networking crate. This is not a big deal, but it's nice to avoid shifting things between the stack and heap.
- Avoids cloning *all the blocks* in *every chain segment* during sync.
- It also has the potential to clean up our code where we need to pass an *owned* block around so we can send it back in the case of an error (I didn't do much of this, my PR is already big enough 😅)
- The `BeaconChain::HeadSafetyStatus` struct was removed. It was an old relic from prior merge specs.
For motivation for this change, see https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3244#issuecomment-1160963273
## Changes to `canonical_head` and `fork_choice`
Previously, the `BeaconChain` had two separate fields:
```
canonical_head: RwLock<Snapshot>,
fork_choice: RwLock<BeaconForkChoice>
```
Now, we have grouped these values under a single struct:
```
canonical_head: CanonicalHead {
cached_head: RwLock<Arc<Snapshot>>,
fork_choice: RwLock<BeaconForkChoice>
}
```
Apart from ergonomics, the only *actual* change here is wrapping the canonical head snapshot in an `Arc`. This means that we no longer need to hold the `cached_head` (`canonical_head`, in old terms) lock when we want to pull some values from it. This was done to avoid deadlock risks by preventing functions from acquiring (and holding) the `cached_head` and `fork_choice` locks simultaneously.
## Breaking Changes
### The `state` (root) field in the `finalized_checkpoint` SSE event
Consider the scenario where epoch `n` is just finalized, but `start_slot(n)` is skipped. There are two state roots we might in the `finalized_checkpoint` SSE event:
1. The state root of the finalized block, which is `get_block(finalized_checkpoint.root).state_root`.
4. The state root at slot of `start_slot(n)`, which would be the state from (1), but "skipped forward" through any skip slots.
Previously, Lighthouse would choose (2). However, we can see that when [Teku generates that event](
|
||
|
Paul Hauner
|
be11437c27 |
Batch BLS verification for attestations (#2399)
## Issue Addressed NA ## Proposed Changes Adds the ability to verify batches of aggregated/unaggregated attestations from the network. When the `BeaconProcessor` finds there are messages in the aggregated or unaggregated attestation queues, it will first check the length of the queue: - `== 1` verify the attestation individually. - `>= 2` take up to 64 of those attestations and verify them in a batch. Notably, we only perform batch verification if the queue has a backlog. We don't apply any artificial delays to attestations to try and force them into batches. ### Batching Details To assist with implementing batches we modify `beacon_chain::attestation_verification` to have two distinct categories for attestations: - *Indexed* attestations: those which have passed initial validation and were valid enough for us to derive an `IndexedAttestation`. - *Verified* attestations: those attestations which were indexed *and also* passed signature verification. These are well-formed, interesting messages which were signed by validators. The batching functions accept `n` attestations and then return `n` attestation verification `Result`s, where those `Result`s can be any combination of `Ok` or `Err`. In other words, we attempt to verify as many attestations as possible and return specific per-attestation results so peer scores can be updated, if required. When we batch verify attestations, we first try to map all those attestations to *indexed* attestations. If any of those attestations were able to be indexed, we then perform batch BLS verification on those indexed attestations. If the batch verification succeeds, we convert them into *verified* attestations, disabling individual signature checking. If the batch fails, we convert to verified attestations with individual signature checking enabled. Ultimately, we optimistically try to do a batch verification of attestation signatures and fall-back to individual verification if it fails. This opens an attach vector for "poisoning" the attestations and causing us to waste a batch verification. I argue that peer scoring should do a good-enough job of defending against this and the typical-case gains massively outweigh the worst-case losses. ## Additional Info Before this PR, attestation verification took the attestations by value (instead of by reference). It turns out that this was unnecessary and, in my opinion, resulted in some undesirable ergonomics (e.g., we had to pass the attestation back in the `Err` variant to avoid clones). In this PR I've modified attestation verification so that it now takes a reference. I refactored the `beacon_chain/tests/attestation_verification.rs` tests so they use a builder-esque "tester" struct instead of a weird macro. It made it easier for me to test individual/batch with the same set of tests and I think it was a nice tidy-up. Notably, I did this last to try and make sure my new refactors to *actual* production code would pass under the existing test suite. |