Use the recently published `context_deserialize` and remove it from Lighthouse
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Consolidate our property-testing around `proptest`. This PR was written with Copilot and manually tweaked.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sproul.xyz>
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
This is a `tracing`-driven optimisation. While investigating why Lighthouse is slow to send `newPayload`, I found a suspicious 13ms of computation on the hot path in `gossip_block_into_execution_pending_block_slashable`:
<img width="1998" height="1022" alt="headercalc" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4f88c1a-da23-47b4-b533-cf5479a1c55c" />
Looking at the current implementation we can see that the _only_ thing that happens prior to calling into `from_gossip_verified_block` is the calculation of a `header`. We first call `SignatureVerifiedBlock::from_gossip_verified_block_check_slashable`:
261322c3e3/beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/block_verification.rs (L1075-L1076)
Which is where the `header` is calculated prior to calling `from_gossip_verified_block`:
261322c3e3/beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/block_verification.rs (L1224-L1226)
Notice that the `header` is _only_ used in the case of an error, yet we spend time computing it every time!
This PR moves the calculation of the header (which involves hashing the whole beacon block, including the execution payload), into the error case. We take a cheap clone of the `Arc`'d beacon block on the hot path, and use this for calculating the header _only_ in the case an error actually occurs. This shaves 10-20ms off our pre-newPayload delays, and 10-20ms off every block processing 🎉
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Take 2 of #8390.
Fixes the race condition properly instead of propagating the error. I think this is a better alternative, and doesn't seem to look that bad.
* Lift node id loading or generation from `NetworkService ` startup to the `ClientBuilder`, so that it can be used to compute custody columns for the beacon chain without waiting for Network bootstrap.
I've considered and implemented a few alternatives:
1. passing `node_id` to beacon chain builder and compute columns when creating `CustodyContext`. This approach isn't good for separation of concerns and isn't great for testability
2. passing `ordered_custody_groups` to beacon chain. `CustodyContext` only uses this to compute ordered custody columns, so we might as well lift this logic out, so we don't have to do error handling in `CustodyContext` construction. Less tests to update;.
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jchen.tc@gmail.com>
Part of a fork-choice tech debt clean-up https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/8325https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/7089 (non-finalized checkpoint sync) changes the meaning of the checkpoints inside fork-choice. It turns out that we persist the justified and finalized checkpoints **twice** in fork-choice
1. Inside the fork-choice store
2. Inside the proto-array
There's no reason for 2. except for making the function signature of some methods smallers. It's not consistent with the rest of the crate, because in some functions we pass the external variable of time (current_slot) via args, but then read the finalized checkpoint from the internal state. Passing both variables as args makes fork-choice easier to reason about at the cost of a few extra lines.
Remove the unnecessary state (`justified_checkpoint`, `finalized_checkpoint`) inside `ProtoArray`, to make it easier to reason about.
Co-Authored-By: dapplion <35266934+dapplion@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michaelsproul@users.noreply.github.com>
#6022
Use `alloy_rpc_types::Transaction` to replace the `ethers_core::Transaction` inside the execution block generator.
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
* add proces_execution_bid
* add has_builder_withdrawal_credential
* process_execution_payload_bid signature is infinity check for self-build
* process_execution_payload_bid updates per consensus spec v1.6.0-beta.1 release
* process_execution_bid to avoid expensive lookups for 0 amount bids
* verify builder not slashed even for self-building
`beacon-chain-tests` is now regularly taking 1h+ on CI since Fulu fork was added.
This PR attemtpts to reduce the test time by bringing down the number of blobs generated in tests - instead of generating 0..max_blobs, the generator now generates 0..1 blobs by default, and this can be modified by setting `harness.execution_block_generator.set_min_blob_count(n)`.
Note: The blobs are pre-generated and doesn't require too much CPU to generate however processing a larger number of them on the beacon chain does take a lot of time.
This PR also include a few other small improvements
- Our slowest test (`chain_segment_varying_chunk_size`) runs 3x faster in Fulu just by reusing chain segments
- Avoid re-running fork specific tests on all forks
- Fix a bunch of tests that depends on the harness's existing random blob generation, which is fragile
beacon chain test time on test machine is **~2x** faster:
### `unstable`
```
Summary [ 751.586s] 291 tests run: 291 passed (13 slow), 0 skipped
```
### this branch
```
Summary [ 373.792s] 291 tests run: 291 passed (2 slow), 0 skipped
```
The next set of tests to optimise is the ones that use [`get_chain_segment`](77a9af96de/beacon_node/beacon_chain/tests/block_verification.rs (L45)), as it by default build 320 blocks with supernode - an easy optimisation would be to build these blocks with cgc = 8 for tests that only require fullnodes.
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jchen.tc@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
The beacon API spec wasn't updated to use the Fulu definition of `dependent_root` for the proposer duties endpoint. No other client updated their logic, so to retain backwards compatibility the decision has been made to continue using the block root at the end of epoch `N - 1`, and introduce a new v2 endpoint down the track to use the correct dependent root.
Eth R&D discussion: https://discord.com/channels/595666850260713488/598292067260825641/1433036715848765562
Change the behaviour of the v1 endpoint back to using the last slot of `N - 1` rather than the last slot of `N - 2`. This introduces the possibility of dependent root false positives (the root can change without changing the shuffling), but causes the least compatibility issues with other clients.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/8012
Replace all instances of `VariableList::from` and `FixedVector::from` to their `try_from` variants.
While I tried to use proper error handling in most cases, there were certain situations where adding an `expect` for situations where `try_from` can trivially never fail avoided adding a lot of extra complexity.
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michaelsproul@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
#7603
#### Custody backfill sync service
Similar in many ways to the current backfill service. There may be ways to unify the two services. The difficulty there is that the current backfill service tightly couples blocks and their associated blobs/data columns. Any attempts to unify the two services should be left to a separate PR in my opinion.
#### `SyncNeworkContext`
`SyncNetworkContext` manages custody sync data columns by range requests separetly from other sync RPC requests. I think this is a nice separation considering that custody backfill is its own service.
#### Data column import logic
The import logic verifies KZG committments and that the data columns block root matches the block root in the nodes store before importing columns
#### New channel to send messages to `SyncManager`
Now external services can communicate with the `SyncManager`. In this PR this channel is used to trigger a custody sync. Alternatively we may be able to use the existing `mpsc` channel that the `SyncNetworkContext` uses to communicate with the `SyncManager`. I will spend some time reviewing this.
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <eserilev@ucsc.edu>
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <eserilev@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: dapplion <35266934+dapplion@users.noreply.github.com>
* gloas envelope helpers
* rename execution_bid to execution_payload_bid
* builder_payment_threshold_numerator and builder_payment_threshold_denominator are not configurable but are constants
* update payload attestation message signature to be unaggregated type
* updates per pr review
Addressing more review comments from:
- https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/8101
I've also tweaked a few more things that I think are minor bugs.
- Instrument `ensure_state_can_determine_proposers_for_epoch`
- Fix `block_root` usage in `compute_proposer_duties_from_head`. This was a regression introduced in 8101 😬 .
- Update the `state_advance_timer` to prime the next-epoch proposer cache post-Fulu.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
#7894
Moves the `Interchange` format from `slashing_protection` and thus removes the dependency on `slashing_protection` from `eth2` which can now just depend on the slimmer `eip_3076` crate.
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
Update `ForkName::latest_stable` to Fulu, reflecting our plan to stabilise Fulu in the immediate future!
This will lead to some more tests running with Fulu rather than Electra.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Use quoted integers for `state.proposer_lookahead` when serializing JSON. This is standard for all integer fields, but was missed for the newly added proposer lookahead. I noticed this issue while inspecting the head state on a local devnet.
I'm glad we found this before someone reported it :P
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
- [x] Remove the unnecessary `_MILLIS` suffix from `MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY`
- [x] Add missing Deneb preset `KZG_COMMITMENT_INCLUSION_PROOF_DEPTH`, not to be confused with `KZG_COMMITMENTS_INCLUSION_PROOF_DEPTH` (plural) from Fulu...
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
