## Issue Addressed
Resolves#1100
## Proposed Changes
* Implement the `SafeArith` trait for `Slot` and `Epoch`, so that methods like `safe_add` become available.
* Tweak the `SafeArith` trait to allow a different `Rhs` type (analagous to `std::ops::Add`, etc).
* Add a `legacy-arith` feature to `types` and `state_processing` that conditionally enables implementations of
the `std` ops with saturating semantics.
* Check compilation of `types` and `state_processing` _without_ `legacy-arith` on CI,
thus guaranteeing that they only use the `SafeArith` primitives 🎉
## Additional Info
The `legacy-arith` feature gets turned on by all higher-level crates that depend on `state_processing` or `types`, thus allowing the beacon chain, networking, and other components to continue to rely on the availability of ops like `+`, `-`, `*`, etc.
**This is a consensus-breaking change**, but brings us in line with the spec, and our incompatibilities shouldn't have been reachable with any valid configuration of Eth2 parameters.
## Proposed Changes
This is an extraction of the quoted int code from #1569, that I've come to rely on for #1544.
It allows us to parse integers from serde strings in YAML, JSON, etc. The main differences from the code in Paul's original PR are:
* Added a submodule that makes quoting mandatory (`require_quotes`).
* Decoding is generic over the type `T` being decoded. You can use `#[serde(with = "serde_utils::quoted_u64::require_quotes")]` on `Epoch` and `Slot` fields (this is what I do in my slashing protection PR).
I've turned on quoting for `Epoch` and `Slot` in this PR, but will leave the other `types` changes to you Paul.
I opted to put everything in the `conseus/serde_utils` module so that BLS can use it without a circular dependency. In future when we want to publish `types` I think we could publish `serde_utils` as `lighthouse_serde_utils` or something. Open to other ideas on this front too.
* Process exits and slashings off the network
* Fix rest_api tests
* Add op verification tests
* Add tests for pruning of slashings in the op pool
* Address Paul's review comments
