I found myself having to update this code for Gloas, and figured we may as well delete it seeing as it doesn't work.
See:
- https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/4198
Delete all `fork_revert` logic and the accompanying test.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Which issue # does this PR address?
None
All of these are performing a check, and adding a batch, or creating a new lookup, or a new query, etc..
Hence all of these limits would be off by one.
Example:
```rust
// BACKFILL_BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE = 5
if self.batches.iter().filter(...).count() >= BACKFILL_BATCH_BUFFER_SIZE {
return None; // ← REJECT
}
// ... later adds batch via Entry::Vacant(entry).insert(...)
```
Without the `>` being changed to a `>=` , we would allow 6. The same idea applies to all changes proposed.
Co-Authored-By: Antoine James <antoine@ethereum.org>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jchen.tc@gmail.com>
Fix the failure of the beacon-chain tests for phase0/altair, which now only runs nightly.
Just skip the payload invalidation tests, they don't make any sense prior to Bellatrix anyway.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Since https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/6847, invalid `BlocksByRange`/`BlobsByRange` requests, which do not comply with the spec, are [handled in the Handler](3d16d1080f/beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/rpc/handler.rs (L880-L911)). Any peer that sends an invalid request is penalized and disconnected.
However, other kinds of invalid rpc request, which result in decoding errors, are just dropped. No penalty is applied and the connection with the peer remains.
I have added handling for the `ListenUpgradeError` event to notify the application of an `RPCError:InvalidData` error and disconnect to the peer that sent the invalid rpc request.
I also added tests for handling invalid rpc requests.
Co-Authored-By: ackintosh <sora.akatsuki@gmail.com>
None
I noticed that `observed_column_sidecars` is missing its prune call in the finalization handler, which results in a memory leak on long-running nodes (very slow (**7MB/day**)) :
13dfa9200f/beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/canonical_head.rs (L940-L959)
Both caches use the same generic type `ObservedDataSidecars<T>:`
22ec4b3271/beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/beacon_chain.rs (L413-L416)
The type's documentation explicitly requires manual pruning:
> "*The cache supports pruning based upon the finalized epoch. It does not automatically prune, you must call Self::prune manually.*"
b4704eab4a/beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/observed_data_sidecars.rs (L66-L74)
Currently:
- `observed_blob_sidecars` => pruned
- `observed_column_sidecars` => **NOT** pruned
Without pruning, the underlying HashMap accumulates entries indefinitely, causing continuous memory growth until the node restarts.
Co-Authored-By: Antoine James <antoine@ethereum.org>
The flow for local block building is
1. Create execution payload and bid
2. Construct beacon block
3. Sign beacon block and publish
4. Sign execution payload and publish
This PR adds the beacon block v4 flow , GET payload envelope and POST payload envelope (local block building only). The spec for these endpoints can be found here: https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/pull/552 and is subject to change.
We needed a way to store the unsigned execution payload envelope associated to the execution payload bid that was included in the block. I introduced a new cache that stores these unsigned execution payload envelopes. the GET payload envelope queries this cache directly so that a proposer, after publishing a block, can fetch the payload envelope + sign and publish it.
I kept payload signing and publishing within the validators block service to keep things simple for now. The idea was to build out a block production MVP for devnet 0, try not to affect any non gloas code paths and build things out in such a way that it will be easy to deprecate pre-gloas code paths later on (for example block production v2 and v3).
We will eventually need to track which beacon node was queried for the block so that we can later query it for the payload. But thats not needed for the devnet.
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <eserilev@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Chen <jchen.tc@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <eserilev@ucsc.edu>
