- test_utils: Heze branch uses DataColumnSidecarGloas (shared format), keeps
heze_enabled() check ahead of gloas_enabled() so Heze blocks are handled first
- genesis.rs: Keep both Gloas and Heze bid initialisation in genesis_block()
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes:
- https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/8689
- Calculate the proposer index on the canonical chain (from canonical head) at `slot` and plumb it through to fork choice so it can be used to determine whether or not to apply the proposer boost. We use the proposer cache to handle state advances and avoid duplicate work.
- Update our FC tests to use `block.message().proposer_index()` (always pass), we are not attempting to test this feature in those tests. The EF tests use the correct canonical proposer idnex via `on_block`, except for invalid blocks which just auto-pass this check (these blocks get rejected by other checks in `on_block` anyway).
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
#6689
Inspired by the initial implementation of #9108, credit to @chong-he.
This adds an extension trait to `Hash256` and add a `short` method to provide smaller formatted hashes for logging.
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
For gloas `attestation.data.index` should be set to 1 if we are attesting to a block whose slot is not the attestation duty slot and slot payload_status is `FULL`
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <eserilev@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <eserilev@ucsc.edu>
Co-Authored-By: dapplion <35266934+dapplion@users.noreply.github.com>
We had a bug when performing batch builder exit signature verification. The EF spec tests cover this case, but the EF tests only calls individual signature verification (which is a separate code path). This PR unifies the two code paths. We should probably spend some time reviewing EF test code coverage and make sure we don't have separate code paths that do similar things.
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <eserilev@ucsc.edu>
Fix a **consensus fault** in `PreEpochCache` 🙀
Fortunately it's only reachable on a network with `total_active_balance=0`, i.e. a network that's already completely dead. As such this PR is not time-sensitive in any way.
Add the floor on `total_effective_balance` when converting from `PreEpochCache` to `EpochCache`. An alternative would be to add the floor inside `PreEpochCache::get_total_active_balance`, however that would be redundant, as the only place this function is called outside this file is in single-pass epoch processing:
176cce585c/consensus/state_processing/src/per_epoch_processing/single_pass.rs (L461-L462)
The `set_total_active_balance` call already handles the floor.
A regression test is included.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
N/A
Adds lints for rust 1.95. Mostly cosmetic.
1. .zip(a.into_iter()) -> .zip(a) . Also a few more places where into_iter is not required
2. replace sort_by with sort_by_key
3. move if statements inside match block.
4. use checked_div instead of if statements. I think this is debatable in terms of being better, happy to remove it if others also feel its unnecessary
Co-Authored-By: Pawan Dhananjay <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
Gossip verify and cache bids and proposer preferences. This PR also ensures we subscribe to new fork topics one epoch early instead of two slots early. This is required for proposer preferences.
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <eserilev@gmail.com>
- #6689
The intention is to only modify the INFO logs that's emitted regularly to reduce the verbosity. But I understand that this change will affect other display in the logs too that uses the `ExecutionBlockHash` display. So would love some feedbacks about the change.
Co-Authored-By: Tan Chee Keong <tanck@sigmaprime.io>
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
Lighthouse uses `MIN_EPOCHS_FOR_BLOB_SIDECARS_REQUESTS` for blob **and column retention** instead of `MIN_EPOCHS_FOR_DATA_COLUMN_SIDECARS_REQUESTS` if Fulu activated less than `MIN_EPOCHS_FOR_BLOB_SIDECARS_REQUESTS` epochs ago - also if Fulu activated at genesis. This causes unexpected behaviour, as there are no blob sidecars to be stored or requested in such networks.
~~Add a special case to avoid that logic in post-Fulu genesis networks (`fulu_fork_epoch == 0`)~~
If the blob retention period would start in the fulu fork epoch, use the `min_epochs_for_data_column_sidecars_requests`, as there are no blobs to retain in Fulu.
Co-Authored-By: Daniel Knopik <daniel@dknopik.de>
Closes:
- https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/9002
- Commit `config.yaml` for minimal and mainnet to `consensus/types/configs`. For now we omit any auto-downloading logic, to avoid the hassles of dealing with Github rate limits etc on CI. Unfortunately these files are NOT bundled inside the spec tests.
- Fix the values of `min_builder_withdrawability_delay` for minimal and mainnet. These discrepancies aren't caught by the current spec tests, because the spec tests are missing data: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/5005. Will be fixed in the next release/when we update to nightly.
- Fix the blob schedule for `minimal`, which should be empty, NOT inherited from mainnet.
- Keep `SECONDS_PER_SLOT` for now because the Kurtosis tests fail upon their complete removal. We will be able to completely remove `SECONDS_PER_SLOT` soon.
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
`serde_yaml` is now deprecated. The API-compatible `yaml_serde` should be used instead.
Replace `serde_yaml` with `yaml_serde`. This is purely mechanical as the API is 1-to-1.
Co-Authored-By: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
With LH v8.1.3 supporting Fulu-on-Gnosis, we no longer need these DB migrations. All Lighthouse nodes running in prod will soon be updated to LH v8.0.0+ and schema v28+.
This PR helps with Gloas fork choice changes, by allowing us to avoid updating old schema migrations when adding V29 for Gloas:
- https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/9025
Co-Authored-By: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Serves envelope by range and by root requests. Added PayloadEnvelopeStreamer so that we dont need to alter upstream code when we introduce blinded payload envelopes.
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri- Levi <eserilev@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Eitan Seri-Levi <eserilev@ucsc.edu>
Co-Authored-By: dapplion <35266934+dapplion@users.noreply.github.com>
