## Issue Addressed NA ## Proposed Changes Add some documentation about migrating pre-merge Lighthouse to post-merge Lighthouse. ## Additional Info NA
5.2 KiB
Merge Migration
This document provides detail for users who have been running a Lighthouse node before the merge and are now preparing their node for the merge transition.
"Pre-Merge" and "Post-Merge"
As of v2.4.0 Lighthouse can be considered to have two modes:
- "Pre-merge":
--execution-endpointflag is not provided. - "Post-merge":
--execution-endpointflag is provided.
A "pre-merge" node, by definition, will fail to transition through the merge. Such a node must be upgraded before the Bellatrix upgrade.
Migration
Let us look at an example of the command line arguments for a pre-merge production staking BN:
lighthouse \
--network mainnet \
beacon_node \
--http \
--eth1-endpoints http://localhost:8545,https://TOKEN@eth2-beacon-mainnet.infura.io
Converting the above to a post-merge configuration would render:
lighthouse \
--network mainnet \
beacon_node \
--http \
--execution-endpoint http://localhost:8551
--execution-jwt ~/.ethereum/geth/jwtsecret
The changes here are:
- Remove
--eth1-endpoints- The endpoint at
localhostcan be retained, it is our local execution engine. Once it is upgraded to a merge-compatible release it will be used in the post-merge environment. - The
infura.ioendpoint will be abandoned, Infura and most other third-party node providers are not compatible with post-merge BNs.
- The endpoint at
- Add the
--execution-endpointflag.- We have reused the node at
localhost, however we've switched to the authenticated engine API port8551. All execution engines will have a specific port for this API, however it might not be8551, see their documentation for details.
- We have reused the node at
- Add the
--execution-jwtflag.- This is the path to a file containing a 32-byte secret for authenticating the BN with the execution engine. In this example our execution engine is Geth, so we've chosen the default location for Geth. Your execution engine might have a different path. It is critical that both the BN and execution engine reference a file with the same value, otherwise they'll fail to communicate.
Note that the --network and --http flags haven't changed. The only changes required for the
merge are ensuring that --execution-endpoint and --execution-jwt flags are provided! In fact,
you can even leave the --eth1-endpoints flag there, it will be ignored. This is not recommended as
a deprecation warning will be logged and Lighthouse may remove these flags in the future.
There are no changes required for the validator client, apart from ensure it has been updated to the
same version as the beacon node. Check the version with lighthouse --version.
The relationship between --eth1-endpoints and --execution-endpoint
Pre-merge users will be familiar with the --eth1-endpoints flag. This provides a list of Ethereum
"eth1" nodes (e.g., Geth, Nethermind, etc). Each beacon node (BN) can have multiple eth1 endpoints
and each eth1 endpoint can have many BNs connection (many-to-many relationship). The eth1 node
provides a source of truth for the deposit
contract and beacon chain proposers include this
information in beacon blocks in order to on-board new validators. BNs exclusively use the eth
namespace on the eth1 JSON-RPC API to
achieve this.
To progress through the Bellatrix upgrade nodes will need a new connection to an "eth1" node;
--execution-endpoint. This connection has a few different properties. Firstly, the term "eth1
node" has been deprecated and replaced with "execution engine". Whilst "eth1 node" and "execution
engine" still refer to the same projects (Geth, Nethermind, etc) the former refers to the pre-merge
versions and the latter refers to post-merge versions. Secondly, there is a strict one-to-one
relationship between Lighthouse and the execution engine; only one Lighthouse node can connect to
one execution engine. Thirdly, it is impossible to fully verify the post-merge chain without an
execution engine. It was possible to verify the pre-merge chain without an eth1 node, it was just
impossible to reliably propose blocks without it.
Since an execution engine is a hard requirement in the post-merge chain and the execution engine
contains the transaction history of the Ethereum chain, there is no longer a need for the
--eth1-endpoints flag for information about the deposit contract. The --execution-endpoint can
be used for all such queries. Therefore we can say that where --execution-endpoint is included
--eth1-endpoints should be omitted.
What about multiple execution endpoints?
Since an execution engine can only have one connected BN, the value of having multiple execution engines connected to the same BN is very low. An execution engine cannot be shared between BNs to reduce costs.
Whilst having multiple execution engines connected to a single BN might be useful for advanced testing scenarios, Lighthouse (and other consensus clients) have decided to support only one execution endpoint. Such scenarios could be resolved with a custom-made HTTP proxy.