mirror of
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git
synced 2026-03-10 12:11:59 +00:00
1353 lines
50 KiB
Rust
1353 lines
50 KiB
Rust
use crate::{
|
|
common::{
|
|
decrease_balance, increase_balance,
|
|
update_progressive_balances_cache::initialize_progressive_balances_cache,
|
|
},
|
|
epoch_cache::{PreEpochCache, initialize_epoch_cache},
|
|
per_block_processing::is_valid_deposit_signature,
|
|
per_epoch_processing::{Delta, Error, ParticipationEpochSummary},
|
|
};
|
|
use itertools::izip;
|
|
use milhouse::{Cow, List, Vector};
|
|
use safe_arith::{SafeArith, SafeArithIter};
|
|
use std::cmp::{max, min};
|
|
use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashMap};
|
|
use tracing::instrument;
|
|
use typenum::Unsigned;
|
|
use types::{
|
|
ActivationQueue, BeaconState, BeaconStateError, BuilderPendingPayment, ChainSpec, Checkpoint,
|
|
DepositData, Epoch, EthSpec, ExitCache, ForkName, ParticipationFlags, PendingDeposit,
|
|
ProgressiveBalancesCache, RelativeEpoch, Validator,
|
|
consts::altair::{
|
|
NUM_FLAG_INDICES, PARTICIPATION_FLAG_WEIGHTS, TIMELY_HEAD_FLAG_INDEX,
|
|
TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX, WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
pub struct SinglePassConfig {
|
|
pub inactivity_updates: bool,
|
|
pub rewards_and_penalties: bool,
|
|
pub registry_updates: bool,
|
|
pub slashings: bool,
|
|
pub pending_deposits: bool,
|
|
pub pending_consolidations: bool,
|
|
pub effective_balance_updates: bool,
|
|
pub proposer_lookahead: bool,
|
|
pub builder_pending_payments: bool,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl Default for SinglePassConfig {
|
|
fn default() -> SinglePassConfig {
|
|
Self::enable_all()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl SinglePassConfig {
|
|
pub fn enable_all() -> SinglePassConfig {
|
|
Self {
|
|
inactivity_updates: true,
|
|
rewards_and_penalties: true,
|
|
registry_updates: true,
|
|
slashings: true,
|
|
pending_deposits: true,
|
|
pending_consolidations: true,
|
|
effective_balance_updates: true,
|
|
proposer_lookahead: true,
|
|
builder_pending_payments: true,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn disable_all() -> SinglePassConfig {
|
|
SinglePassConfig {
|
|
inactivity_updates: false,
|
|
rewards_and_penalties: false,
|
|
registry_updates: false,
|
|
slashings: false,
|
|
pending_deposits: false,
|
|
pending_consolidations: false,
|
|
effective_balance_updates: false,
|
|
proposer_lookahead: false,
|
|
builder_pending_payments: false,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Values from the state that are immutable throughout epoch processing.
|
|
struct StateContext {
|
|
current_epoch: Epoch,
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint: Checkpoint,
|
|
is_in_inactivity_leak: bool,
|
|
total_active_balance: u64,
|
|
churn_limit: u64,
|
|
fork_name: ForkName,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct RewardsAndPenaltiesContext {
|
|
unslashed_participating_increments_array: [u64; NUM_FLAG_INDICES],
|
|
active_increments: u64,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct SlashingsContext {
|
|
adjusted_total_slashing_balance: u64,
|
|
target_withdrawable_epoch: Epoch,
|
|
penalty_per_effective_balance_increment: u64,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct PendingDepositsContext {
|
|
/// The value to set `next_deposit_index` to *after* processing completes.
|
|
next_deposit_index: usize,
|
|
/// The value to set `deposit_balance_to_consume` to *after* processing completes.
|
|
deposit_balance_to_consume: u64,
|
|
/// Total balance increases for each validator due to pending balance deposits.
|
|
validator_deposits_to_process: HashMap<usize, u64>,
|
|
/// The deposits to append to `pending_deposits` after processing all applicable deposits.
|
|
deposits_to_postpone: Vec<PendingDeposit>,
|
|
/// New validators to be added to the state *after* processing completes.
|
|
new_validator_deposits: Vec<PendingDeposit>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct EffectiveBalancesContext {
|
|
downward_threshold: u64,
|
|
upward_threshold: u64,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Clone)]
|
|
pub struct ValidatorInfo {
|
|
pub index: usize,
|
|
pub effective_balance: u64,
|
|
pub base_reward: u64,
|
|
pub is_eligible: bool,
|
|
pub is_slashed: bool,
|
|
pub is_active_current_epoch: bool,
|
|
pub is_active_previous_epoch: bool,
|
|
// Used for determining rewards.
|
|
pub previous_epoch_participation: ParticipationFlags,
|
|
// Used for updating the progressive balances cache for next epoch.
|
|
pub current_epoch_participation: ParticipationFlags,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl ValidatorInfo {
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
pub fn is_unslashed_participating_index(&self, flag_index: usize) -> Result<bool, Error> {
|
|
Ok(self.is_active_previous_epoch
|
|
&& !self.is_slashed
|
|
&& self
|
|
.previous_epoch_participation
|
|
.has_flag(flag_index)
|
|
.map_err(|_| Error::InvalidFlagIndex(flag_index))?)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[instrument(skip_all)]
|
|
pub fn process_epoch_single_pass<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<E>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
conf: SinglePassConfig,
|
|
) -> Result<ParticipationEpochSummary<E>, Error> {
|
|
initialize_epoch_cache(state, spec)?;
|
|
initialize_progressive_balances_cache(state, spec)?;
|
|
state.build_exit_cache(spec)?;
|
|
state.build_committee_cache(RelativeEpoch::Previous, spec)?;
|
|
state.build_committee_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
|
|
state.update_pubkey_cache()?;
|
|
|
|
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch();
|
|
let current_epoch = state.current_epoch();
|
|
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch()?;
|
|
let is_in_inactivity_leak = state.is_in_inactivity_leak(previous_epoch, spec)?;
|
|
let total_active_balance = state.get_total_active_balance()?;
|
|
let churn_limit = state.get_validator_churn_limit(spec)?;
|
|
let activation_churn_limit = state.get_activation_churn_limit(spec)?;
|
|
let finalized_checkpoint = state.finalized_checkpoint();
|
|
let fork_name = state.fork_name_unchecked();
|
|
|
|
let state_ctxt = &StateContext {
|
|
current_epoch,
|
|
next_epoch,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
is_in_inactivity_leak,
|
|
total_active_balance,
|
|
churn_limit,
|
|
fork_name,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Contexts that require immutable access to `state`.
|
|
let slashings_ctxt = &SlashingsContext::new(state, state_ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
let mut next_epoch_cache = PreEpochCache::new_for_next_epoch(state)?;
|
|
|
|
let pending_deposits_ctxt = if fork_name.electra_enabled() && conf.pending_deposits {
|
|
Some(PendingDepositsContext::new(state, spec, &conf)?)
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let mut earliest_exit_epoch = state.earliest_exit_epoch().ok();
|
|
let mut exit_balance_to_consume = state.exit_balance_to_consume().ok();
|
|
let validators_in_consolidations = get_validators_in_consolidations(state);
|
|
|
|
// Split the state into several disjoint mutable borrows.
|
|
let (
|
|
validators,
|
|
balances,
|
|
previous_epoch_participation,
|
|
current_epoch_participation,
|
|
inactivity_scores,
|
|
progressive_balances,
|
|
exit_cache,
|
|
epoch_cache,
|
|
) = state.mutable_validator_fields()?;
|
|
|
|
let num_validators = validators.len();
|
|
|
|
// Take a snapshot of the validators and participation before mutating. This is used for
|
|
// informational purposes (e.g. by the validator monitor).
|
|
let summary = ParticipationEpochSummary::new(
|
|
validators.clone(),
|
|
previous_epoch_participation.clone(),
|
|
current_epoch_participation.clone(),
|
|
previous_epoch,
|
|
current_epoch,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Compute shared values required for different parts of epoch processing.
|
|
let rewards_ctxt = &RewardsAndPenaltiesContext::new(progressive_balances, state_ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
|
|
let mut activation_queues = if !fork_name.electra_enabled() {
|
|
let activation_queue = epoch_cache
|
|
.activation_queue()?
|
|
.get_validators_eligible_for_activation(
|
|
finalized_checkpoint.epoch,
|
|
activation_churn_limit as usize,
|
|
);
|
|
let next_epoch_activation_queue = ActivationQueue::default();
|
|
Some((activation_queue, next_epoch_activation_queue))
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
};
|
|
let effective_balances_ctxt = &EffectiveBalancesContext::new(spec)?;
|
|
|
|
// Iterate over the validators and related fields in one pass.
|
|
let mut validators_iter = validators.iter_cow();
|
|
let mut balances_iter = balances.iter_cow();
|
|
let mut inactivity_scores_iter = inactivity_scores.iter_cow();
|
|
|
|
for (index, &previous_epoch_participation, ¤t_epoch_participation) in izip!(
|
|
0..num_validators,
|
|
previous_epoch_participation.iter(),
|
|
current_epoch_participation.iter(),
|
|
) {
|
|
let (_, mut validator) = validators_iter
|
|
.next_cow()
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(index))?;
|
|
let (_, mut balance) = balances_iter
|
|
.next_cow()
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(index))?;
|
|
let (_, mut inactivity_score) = inactivity_scores_iter
|
|
.next_cow()
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(index))?;
|
|
|
|
let is_active_current_epoch = validator.is_active_at(current_epoch);
|
|
let is_active_previous_epoch = validator.is_active_at(previous_epoch);
|
|
let is_eligible = is_active_previous_epoch
|
|
|| (validator.slashed && previous_epoch.safe_add(1)? < validator.withdrawable_epoch);
|
|
|
|
let base_reward = if is_eligible {
|
|
epoch_cache.get_base_reward(index)?
|
|
} else {
|
|
0
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let validator_info = &ValidatorInfo {
|
|
index,
|
|
effective_balance: validator.effective_balance,
|
|
base_reward,
|
|
is_eligible,
|
|
is_slashed: validator.slashed,
|
|
is_active_current_epoch,
|
|
is_active_previous_epoch,
|
|
previous_epoch_participation,
|
|
current_epoch_participation,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
if current_epoch != E::genesis_epoch() {
|
|
// `process_inactivity_updates`
|
|
if conf.inactivity_updates {
|
|
process_single_inactivity_update(
|
|
&mut inactivity_score,
|
|
validator_info,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// `process_rewards_and_penalties`
|
|
if conf.rewards_and_penalties {
|
|
process_single_reward_and_penalty(
|
|
&mut balance,
|
|
&inactivity_score,
|
|
validator_info,
|
|
rewards_ctxt,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// `process_registry_updates`
|
|
if conf.registry_updates {
|
|
let activation_queue_refs = activation_queues
|
|
.as_mut()
|
|
.map(|(current_queue, next_queue)| (&*current_queue, next_queue));
|
|
process_single_registry_update(
|
|
&mut validator,
|
|
validator_info,
|
|
exit_cache,
|
|
activation_queue_refs,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch.as_mut(),
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume.as_mut(),
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// `process_slashings`
|
|
if conf.slashings {
|
|
process_single_slashing(&mut balance, &validator, slashings_ctxt, state_ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// `process_pending_deposits`
|
|
if let Some(pending_balance_deposits_ctxt) = &pending_deposits_ctxt {
|
|
process_pending_deposits_for_validator(
|
|
&mut balance,
|
|
validator_info,
|
|
pending_balance_deposits_ctxt,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// `process_effective_balance_updates`
|
|
if conf.effective_balance_updates {
|
|
if validators_in_consolidations.contains(&validator_info.index) {
|
|
process_single_dummy_effective_balance_update(
|
|
validator_info.index,
|
|
&validator,
|
|
&mut next_epoch_cache,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
)?;
|
|
} else {
|
|
process_single_effective_balance_update(
|
|
validator_info.index,
|
|
*balance,
|
|
&mut validator,
|
|
validator_info.current_epoch_participation,
|
|
&mut next_epoch_cache,
|
|
progressive_balances,
|
|
effective_balances_ctxt,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if conf.registry_updates && fork_name.electra_enabled() {
|
|
if let Ok(earliest_exit_epoch_state) = state.earliest_exit_epoch_mut() {
|
|
*earliest_exit_epoch_state =
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch.ok_or(Error::MissingEarliestExitEpoch)?;
|
|
}
|
|
if let Ok(exit_balance_to_consume_state) = state.exit_balance_to_consume_mut() {
|
|
*exit_balance_to_consume_state =
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume.ok_or(Error::MissingExitBalanceToConsume)?;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Finish processing pending balance deposits if relevant.
|
|
//
|
|
// This *could* be reordered after `process_pending_consolidations` which pushes only to the end
|
|
// of the `pending_deposits` list. But we may as well preserve the write ordering used
|
|
// by the spec and do this first.
|
|
if let Some(ctxt) = pending_deposits_ctxt {
|
|
let mut new_balance_deposits = List::try_from_iter(
|
|
state
|
|
.pending_deposits()?
|
|
.iter_from(ctxt.next_deposit_index)?
|
|
.cloned(),
|
|
)?;
|
|
for deposit in ctxt.deposits_to_postpone {
|
|
new_balance_deposits.push(deposit)?;
|
|
}
|
|
*state.pending_deposits_mut()? = new_balance_deposits;
|
|
*state.deposit_balance_to_consume_mut()? = ctxt.deposit_balance_to_consume;
|
|
|
|
// `new_validator_deposits` may contain multiple deposits with the same pubkey where
|
|
// the first deposit creates the new validator and the others are topups.
|
|
// Each item in the vec is a (pubkey, validator_index)
|
|
let mut added_validators = Vec::new();
|
|
for deposit in ctxt.new_validator_deposits {
|
|
let deposit_data = DepositData {
|
|
pubkey: deposit.pubkey,
|
|
withdrawal_credentials: deposit.withdrawal_credentials,
|
|
amount: deposit.amount,
|
|
signature: deposit.signature,
|
|
};
|
|
// Only check the signature if this is the first deposit for the validator,
|
|
// following the logic from `apply_pending_deposit` in the spec.
|
|
if let Some(validator_index) = state.get_validator_index(&deposit_data.pubkey)? {
|
|
state
|
|
.get_balance_mut(validator_index)?
|
|
.safe_add_assign(deposit_data.amount)?;
|
|
} else if is_valid_deposit_signature(&deposit_data, spec).is_ok() {
|
|
// Apply the new deposit to the state
|
|
let validator_index = state.add_validator_to_registry(
|
|
deposit_data.pubkey,
|
|
deposit_data.withdrawal_credentials,
|
|
deposit_data.amount,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
added_validators.push((deposit_data.pubkey, validator_index));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if conf.effective_balance_updates {
|
|
// Re-process effective balance updates for validators affected by top-up of new validators.
|
|
let (
|
|
validators,
|
|
balances,
|
|
_,
|
|
current_epoch_participation,
|
|
_,
|
|
progressive_balances,
|
|
_,
|
|
_,
|
|
) = state.mutable_validator_fields()?;
|
|
for (_, validator_index) in added_validators.iter() {
|
|
let balance = *balances
|
|
.get(*validator_index)
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(*validator_index))?;
|
|
let mut validator = validators
|
|
.get_cow(*validator_index)
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(*validator_index))?;
|
|
let validator_current_epoch_participation = *current_epoch_participation
|
|
.get(*validator_index)
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(*validator_index))?;
|
|
process_single_effective_balance_update(
|
|
*validator_index,
|
|
balance,
|
|
&mut validator,
|
|
validator_current_epoch_participation,
|
|
&mut next_epoch_cache,
|
|
progressive_balances,
|
|
effective_balances_ctxt,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Process consolidations outside the single-pass loop, as they depend on balances for multiple
|
|
// validators and cannot be computed accurately inside the loop.
|
|
if fork_name.electra_enabled() && conf.pending_consolidations {
|
|
process_pending_consolidations(
|
|
state,
|
|
&validators_in_consolidations,
|
|
&mut next_epoch_cache,
|
|
effective_balances_ctxt,
|
|
conf.effective_balance_updates,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Process builder pending payments outside the single-pass loop, as they depend on balances for multiple
|
|
// validators and cannot be computed accurately inside the loop.
|
|
if fork_name.gloas_enabled() && conf.builder_pending_payments {
|
|
process_builder_pending_payments(state, state_ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Finally, finish updating effective balance caches. We need this to happen *after* processing
|
|
// of pending consolidations, which recomputes some effective balances.
|
|
if conf.effective_balance_updates {
|
|
let next_epoch_total_active_balance = next_epoch_cache.get_total_active_balance();
|
|
state.set_total_active_balance(next_epoch, next_epoch_total_active_balance, spec);
|
|
let next_epoch_activation_queue =
|
|
activation_queues.map_or_else(ActivationQueue::default, |(_, queue)| queue);
|
|
*state.epoch_cache_mut() =
|
|
next_epoch_cache.into_epoch_cache(next_epoch_activation_queue, spec)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if conf.proposer_lookahead && fork_name.fulu_enabled() {
|
|
process_proposer_lookahead(state, spec)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(summary)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(EIP-7917): use balances cache
|
|
pub fn process_proposer_lookahead<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<E>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
let mut lookahead = state.proposer_lookahead()?.clone().to_vec();
|
|
|
|
// Shift out proposers in the first epoch
|
|
lookahead.copy_within((E::slots_per_epoch() as usize).., 0);
|
|
|
|
let next_epoch = state
|
|
.current_epoch()
|
|
.safe_add(spec.min_seed_lookahead.as_u64())?
|
|
.safe_add(1)?;
|
|
let last_epoch_proposers = state.get_beacon_proposer_indices(next_epoch, spec)?;
|
|
|
|
// Fill in the last epoch with new proposer indices
|
|
let last_epoch_start = E::proposer_lookahead_slots().safe_sub(E::slots_per_epoch() as usize)?;
|
|
for (i, proposer) in last_epoch_proposers.into_iter().enumerate() {
|
|
let index = last_epoch_start.safe_add(i)?;
|
|
*lookahead
|
|
.get_mut(index)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::ProposerLookaheadOutOfBounds(index))? = proposer as u64;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
*state.proposer_lookahead_mut()? = Vector::new(lookahead)?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Calculate the quorum threshold for builder payments based on total active balance.
|
|
fn get_builder_payment_quorum_threshold<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<u64, Error> {
|
|
let per_slot_balance = state_ctxt
|
|
.total_active_balance
|
|
.safe_div(E::slots_per_epoch())?;
|
|
let quorum = per_slot_balance.safe_mul(spec.builder_payment_threshold_numerator)?;
|
|
quorum
|
|
.safe_div(spec.builder_payment_threshold_denominator)
|
|
.map_err(Error::from)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Process builder pending payments, moving qualifying payments to withdrawals.
|
|
/// TODO(EIP-7732): Add EF consensus-spec tests for `process_builder_pending_payments`
|
|
/// Currently blocked by EF consensus-spec-tests for Gloas not yet integrated.
|
|
fn process_builder_pending_payments<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<E>,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
let quorum = get_builder_payment_quorum_threshold::<E>(state_ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
|
|
// Collect qualifying payments
|
|
let qualifying_payments = state
|
|
.builder_pending_payments()?
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.take(E::slots_per_epoch() as usize)
|
|
.filter(|payment| payment.weight > quorum)
|
|
.cloned()
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
// Update `builder_pending_withdrawals` with qualifying `builder_pending_payments`
|
|
qualifying_payments
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.try_for_each(|payment| -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
let exit_queue_epoch =
|
|
state.compute_exit_epoch_and_update_churn(payment.withdrawal.amount, spec)?;
|
|
let _withdrawable_epoch =
|
|
exit_queue_epoch.safe_add(spec.min_validator_withdrawability_delay)?;
|
|
|
|
let withdrawal = payment.withdrawal.clone();
|
|
state.builder_pending_withdrawals_mut()?.push(withdrawal)?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
})?;
|
|
|
|
// Move remaining `builder_pending_payments` to start of list and set the rest to default
|
|
let new_payments = state
|
|
.builder_pending_payments()?
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.skip(E::slots_per_epoch() as usize)
|
|
.cloned()
|
|
.chain((0..E::slots_per_epoch() as usize).map(|_| BuilderPendingPayment::default()))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
*state.builder_pending_payments_mut()? = Vector::new(new_payments)?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn process_single_inactivity_update(
|
|
inactivity_score: &mut Cow<u64>,
|
|
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
if !validator_info.is_eligible {
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Increase inactivity score of inactive validators
|
|
if validator_info.is_unslashed_participating_index(TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX)? {
|
|
// Avoid mutating when the inactivity score is 0 and can't go any lower -- the common
|
|
// case.
|
|
if **inactivity_score == 0 {
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
}
|
|
inactivity_score.make_mut()?.safe_sub_assign(1)?;
|
|
} else {
|
|
inactivity_score
|
|
.make_mut()?
|
|
.safe_add_assign(spec.inactivity_score_bias)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Decrease the score of all validators for forgiveness when not during a leak
|
|
if !state_ctxt.is_in_inactivity_leak {
|
|
let deduction = min(spec.inactivity_score_recovery_rate, **inactivity_score);
|
|
inactivity_score.make_mut()?.safe_sub_assign(deduction)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn process_single_reward_and_penalty(
|
|
balance: &mut Cow<u64>,
|
|
inactivity_score: &u64,
|
|
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
|
|
rewards_ctxt: &RewardsAndPenaltiesContext,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
if !validator_info.is_eligible {
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let mut delta = Delta::default();
|
|
for flag_index in 0..NUM_FLAG_INDICES {
|
|
get_flag_index_delta(
|
|
&mut delta,
|
|
validator_info,
|
|
flag_index,
|
|
rewards_ctxt,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
get_inactivity_penalty_delta(
|
|
&mut delta,
|
|
validator_info,
|
|
inactivity_score,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
if delta.rewards != 0 || delta.penalties != 0 {
|
|
let balance = balance.make_mut()?;
|
|
balance.safe_add_assign(delta.rewards)?;
|
|
*balance = balance.saturating_sub(delta.penalties);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn get_flag_index_delta(
|
|
delta: &mut Delta,
|
|
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
|
|
flag_index: usize,
|
|
rewards_ctxt: &RewardsAndPenaltiesContext,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
let base_reward = validator_info.base_reward;
|
|
let weight = get_flag_weight(flag_index)?;
|
|
let unslashed_participating_increments =
|
|
rewards_ctxt.get_unslashed_participating_increments(flag_index)?;
|
|
|
|
if validator_info.is_unslashed_participating_index(flag_index)? {
|
|
if !state_ctxt.is_in_inactivity_leak {
|
|
let reward_numerator = base_reward
|
|
.safe_mul(weight)?
|
|
.safe_mul(unslashed_participating_increments)?;
|
|
delta.reward(
|
|
reward_numerator.safe_div(
|
|
rewards_ctxt
|
|
.active_increments
|
|
.safe_mul(WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR)?,
|
|
)?,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
} else if flag_index != TIMELY_HEAD_FLAG_INDEX {
|
|
delta.penalize(base_reward.safe_mul(weight)?.safe_div(WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR)?)?;
|
|
}
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Get the weight for a `flag_index` from the constant list of all weights.
|
|
fn get_flag_weight(flag_index: usize) -> Result<u64, Error> {
|
|
PARTICIPATION_FLAG_WEIGHTS
|
|
.get(flag_index)
|
|
.copied()
|
|
.ok_or(Error::InvalidFlagIndex(flag_index))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn get_inactivity_penalty_delta(
|
|
delta: &mut Delta,
|
|
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
|
|
inactivity_score: &u64,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
if !validator_info.is_unslashed_participating_index(TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX)? {
|
|
let penalty_numerator = validator_info
|
|
.effective_balance
|
|
.safe_mul(*inactivity_score)?;
|
|
let penalty_denominator = spec
|
|
.inactivity_score_bias
|
|
.safe_mul(spec.inactivity_penalty_quotient_for_fork(state_ctxt.fork_name))?;
|
|
delta.penalize(penalty_numerator.safe_div(penalty_denominator)?)?;
|
|
}
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl RewardsAndPenaltiesContext {
|
|
fn new(
|
|
progressive_balances: &ProgressiveBalancesCache,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<Self, Error> {
|
|
let mut unslashed_participating_increments_array = [0; NUM_FLAG_INDICES];
|
|
for flag_index in 0..NUM_FLAG_INDICES {
|
|
let unslashed_participating_balance =
|
|
progressive_balances.previous_epoch_flag_attesting_balance(flag_index)?;
|
|
let unslashed_participating_increments =
|
|
unslashed_participating_balance.safe_div(spec.effective_balance_increment)?;
|
|
|
|
*unslashed_participating_increments_array
|
|
.get_mut(flag_index)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::InvalidFlagIndex(flag_index))? = unslashed_participating_increments;
|
|
}
|
|
let active_increments = state_ctxt
|
|
.total_active_balance
|
|
.safe_div(spec.effective_balance_increment)?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(Self {
|
|
unslashed_participating_increments_array,
|
|
active_increments,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn get_unslashed_participating_increments(&self, flag_index: usize) -> Result<u64, Error> {
|
|
self.unslashed_participating_increments_array
|
|
.get(flag_index)
|
|
.copied()
|
|
.ok_or(Error::InvalidFlagIndex(flag_index))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
|
|
fn process_single_registry_update(
|
|
validator: &mut Cow<Validator>,
|
|
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
|
|
exit_cache: &mut ExitCache,
|
|
activation_queues: Option<(&BTreeSet<usize>, &mut ActivationQueue)>,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch: Option<&mut Epoch>,
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume: Option<&mut u64>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
if !state_ctxt.fork_name.electra_enabled() {
|
|
let (activation_queue, next_epoch_activation_queue) =
|
|
activation_queues.ok_or(Error::SinglePassMissingActivationQueue)?;
|
|
process_single_registry_update_pre_electra(
|
|
validator,
|
|
validator_info,
|
|
exit_cache,
|
|
activation_queue,
|
|
next_epoch_activation_queue,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)
|
|
} else {
|
|
process_single_registry_update_post_electra(
|
|
validator,
|
|
exit_cache,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch.ok_or(Error::MissingEarliestExitEpoch)?,
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume.ok_or(Error::MissingExitBalanceToConsume)?,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn process_single_registry_update_pre_electra(
|
|
validator: &mut Cow<Validator>,
|
|
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
|
|
exit_cache: &mut ExitCache,
|
|
activation_queue: &BTreeSet<usize>,
|
|
next_epoch_activation_queue: &mut ActivationQueue,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
let current_epoch = state_ctxt.current_epoch;
|
|
|
|
if validator.is_eligible_for_activation_queue(spec, state_ctxt.fork_name) {
|
|
validator.make_mut()?.activation_eligibility_epoch = current_epoch.safe_add(1)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if validator.is_active_at(current_epoch) && validator.effective_balance <= spec.ejection_balance
|
|
{
|
|
initiate_validator_exit(validator, exit_cache, state_ctxt, None, None, spec)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if activation_queue.contains(&validator_info.index) {
|
|
validator.make_mut()?.activation_epoch =
|
|
spec.compute_activation_exit_epoch(current_epoch)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Caching: add to speculative activation queue for next epoch.
|
|
next_epoch_activation_queue.add_if_could_be_eligible_for_activation(
|
|
validator_info.index,
|
|
validator,
|
|
state_ctxt.next_epoch,
|
|
spec,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn process_single_registry_update_post_electra(
|
|
validator: &mut Cow<Validator>,
|
|
exit_cache: &mut ExitCache,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch: &mut Epoch,
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume: &mut u64,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
let current_epoch = state_ctxt.current_epoch;
|
|
|
|
if validator.is_eligible_for_activation_queue(spec, state_ctxt.fork_name) {
|
|
validator.make_mut()?.activation_eligibility_epoch = current_epoch.safe_add(1)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if validator.is_active_at(current_epoch) && validator.effective_balance <= spec.ejection_balance
|
|
{
|
|
initiate_validator_exit(
|
|
validator,
|
|
exit_cache,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
Some(earliest_exit_epoch),
|
|
Some(exit_balance_to_consume),
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if validator.is_eligible_for_activation_with_finalized_checkpoint(
|
|
&state_ctxt.finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
spec,
|
|
) {
|
|
validator.make_mut()?.activation_epoch =
|
|
spec.compute_activation_exit_epoch(current_epoch)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn initiate_validator_exit(
|
|
validator: &mut Cow<Validator>,
|
|
exit_cache: &mut ExitCache,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch: Option<&mut Epoch>,
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume: Option<&mut u64>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
// Return if the validator already initiated exit
|
|
if validator.exit_epoch != spec.far_future_epoch {
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let exit_queue_epoch = if state_ctxt.fork_name.electra_enabled() {
|
|
compute_exit_epoch_and_update_churn(
|
|
validator,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch.ok_or(Error::MissingEarliestExitEpoch)?,
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume.ok_or(Error::MissingExitBalanceToConsume)?,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Compute exit queue epoch
|
|
let delayed_epoch = spec.compute_activation_exit_epoch(state_ctxt.current_epoch)?;
|
|
let mut exit_queue_epoch = exit_cache
|
|
.max_epoch()?
|
|
.map_or(delayed_epoch, |epoch| max(epoch, delayed_epoch));
|
|
let exit_queue_churn = exit_cache.get_churn_at(exit_queue_epoch)?;
|
|
|
|
if exit_queue_churn >= state_ctxt.churn_limit {
|
|
exit_queue_epoch.safe_add_assign(1)?;
|
|
}
|
|
exit_queue_epoch
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let validator = validator.make_mut()?;
|
|
validator.exit_epoch = exit_queue_epoch;
|
|
validator.withdrawable_epoch =
|
|
exit_queue_epoch.safe_add(spec.min_validator_withdrawability_delay)?;
|
|
|
|
exit_cache.record_validator_exit(exit_queue_epoch)?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn compute_exit_epoch_and_update_churn(
|
|
validator: &mut Cow<Validator>,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch_state: &mut Epoch,
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume_state: &mut u64,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<Epoch, Error> {
|
|
let exit_balance = validator.effective_balance;
|
|
let mut earliest_exit_epoch = std::cmp::max(
|
|
*earliest_exit_epoch_state,
|
|
spec.compute_activation_exit_epoch(state_ctxt.current_epoch)?,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let per_epoch_churn = get_activation_exit_churn_limit(state_ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
// New epoch for exits
|
|
let mut exit_balance_to_consume = if *earliest_exit_epoch_state < earliest_exit_epoch {
|
|
per_epoch_churn
|
|
} else {
|
|
*exit_balance_to_consume_state
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Exit doesn't fit in the current earliest epoch
|
|
if exit_balance > exit_balance_to_consume {
|
|
let balance_to_process = exit_balance.safe_sub(exit_balance_to_consume)?;
|
|
let additional_epochs = balance_to_process
|
|
.safe_sub(1)?
|
|
.safe_div(per_epoch_churn)?
|
|
.safe_add(1)?;
|
|
earliest_exit_epoch.safe_add_assign(additional_epochs)?;
|
|
exit_balance_to_consume.safe_add_assign(additional_epochs.safe_mul(per_epoch_churn)?)?;
|
|
}
|
|
// Consume the balance and update state variables
|
|
*exit_balance_to_consume_state = exit_balance_to_consume.safe_sub(exit_balance)?;
|
|
*earliest_exit_epoch_state = earliest_exit_epoch;
|
|
|
|
Ok(earliest_exit_epoch)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn get_activation_exit_churn_limit(
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<u64, Error> {
|
|
Ok(std::cmp::min(
|
|
spec.max_per_epoch_activation_exit_churn_limit,
|
|
get_balance_churn_limit(state_ctxt, spec)?,
|
|
))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn get_balance_churn_limit(state_ctxt: &StateContext, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<u64, Error> {
|
|
let total_active_balance = state_ctxt.total_active_balance;
|
|
let churn = std::cmp::max(
|
|
spec.min_per_epoch_churn_limit_electra,
|
|
total_active_balance.safe_div(spec.churn_limit_quotient)?,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Ok(churn.safe_sub(churn.safe_rem(spec.effective_balance_increment)?)?)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl SlashingsContext {
|
|
fn new<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<E>,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<Self, Error> {
|
|
let sum_slashings = state.get_all_slashings().iter().copied().safe_sum()?;
|
|
let adjusted_total_slashing_balance = min(
|
|
sum_slashings.safe_mul(state.get_proportional_slashing_multiplier(spec))?,
|
|
state_ctxt.total_active_balance,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let target_withdrawable_epoch = state_ctxt
|
|
.current_epoch
|
|
.safe_add(E::EpochsPerSlashingsVector::to_u64().safe_div(2)?)?;
|
|
|
|
let penalty_per_effective_balance_increment = adjusted_total_slashing_balance.safe_div(
|
|
state_ctxt
|
|
.total_active_balance
|
|
.safe_div(spec.effective_balance_increment)?,
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(Self {
|
|
adjusted_total_slashing_balance,
|
|
target_withdrawable_epoch,
|
|
penalty_per_effective_balance_increment,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn process_single_slashing(
|
|
balance: &mut Cow<u64>,
|
|
validator: &Validator,
|
|
slashings_ctxt: &SlashingsContext,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
if validator.slashed && slashings_ctxt.target_withdrawable_epoch == validator.withdrawable_epoch
|
|
{
|
|
let increment = spec.effective_balance_increment;
|
|
let penalty = if state_ctxt.fork_name.electra_enabled() {
|
|
let effective_balance_increments = validator.effective_balance.safe_div(increment)?;
|
|
slashings_ctxt
|
|
.penalty_per_effective_balance_increment
|
|
.safe_mul(effective_balance_increments)?
|
|
} else {
|
|
let penalty_numerator = validator
|
|
.effective_balance
|
|
.safe_div(increment)?
|
|
.safe_mul(slashings_ctxt.adjusted_total_slashing_balance)?;
|
|
penalty_numerator
|
|
.safe_div(state_ctxt.total_active_balance)?
|
|
.safe_mul(increment)?
|
|
};
|
|
*balance.make_mut()? = balance.saturating_sub(penalty);
|
|
}
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl PendingDepositsContext {
|
|
fn new<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<E>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
config: &SinglePassConfig,
|
|
) -> Result<Self, Error> {
|
|
let available_for_processing = state
|
|
.deposit_balance_to_consume()?
|
|
.safe_add(state.get_activation_exit_churn_limit(spec)?)?;
|
|
let current_epoch = state.current_epoch();
|
|
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch()?;
|
|
let mut processed_amount = 0;
|
|
let mut next_deposit_index = 0;
|
|
let mut validator_deposits_to_process = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut deposits_to_postpone = vec![];
|
|
let mut new_validator_deposits = vec![];
|
|
let mut is_churn_limit_reached = false;
|
|
let finalized_slot = state
|
|
.finalized_checkpoint()
|
|
.epoch
|
|
.start_slot(E::slots_per_epoch());
|
|
|
|
let pending_deposits = state.pending_deposits()?;
|
|
|
|
for deposit in pending_deposits.iter() {
|
|
// Do not process deposit requests if the Eth1 bridge deposits are not yet applied.
|
|
if deposit.slot > spec.genesis_slot
|
|
&& state.eth1_deposit_index() < state.deposit_requests_start_index()?
|
|
{
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
// Do not process is deposit slot has not been finalized.
|
|
if deposit.slot > finalized_slot {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
// Do not process if we have reached the limit for the number of deposits
|
|
// processed in an epoch.
|
|
if next_deposit_index >= E::max_pending_deposits_per_epoch() {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
// We have to do a bit of indexing into `validators` here, but I can't see any way
|
|
// around that without changing the spec.
|
|
//
|
|
// We need to work out if `validator.exit_epoch` will be set to a non-default value
|
|
// *after* changes applied by `process_registry_updates`, which in our implementation
|
|
// does not happen until after this (but in the spec happens before). However it's not
|
|
// hard to work out: we don't need to know exactly what value the `exit_epoch` will
|
|
// take, just whether it is non-default. Nor do we need to know the value of
|
|
// `withdrawable_epoch`, because `next_epoch <= withdrawable_epoch` will evaluate to
|
|
// `true` both for the actual value & the default placeholder value (`FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH`).
|
|
let mut is_validator_exited = false;
|
|
let mut is_validator_withdrawn = false;
|
|
let opt_validator_index = state.pubkey_cache().get(&deposit.pubkey);
|
|
if let Some(validator_index) = opt_validator_index {
|
|
let validator = state.get_validator(validator_index)?;
|
|
let already_exited = validator.exit_epoch < spec.far_future_epoch;
|
|
// In the spec process_registry_updates is called before process_pending_deposits
|
|
// so we must account for process_registry_updates ejecting the validator for low balance
|
|
// and setting the exit_epoch to < far_future_epoch. Note that in the spec the effective
|
|
// balance update does not happen until *after* the registry update, so we don't need to
|
|
// account for changes to the effective balance that would push it below the ejection
|
|
// balance here.
|
|
// Note: we only consider this if registry_updates are enabled in the config.
|
|
// EF tests require us to run epoch_processing functions in isolation.
|
|
let will_be_exited = config.registry_updates
|
|
&& (validator.is_active_at(current_epoch)
|
|
&& validator.effective_balance <= spec.ejection_balance);
|
|
is_validator_exited = already_exited || will_be_exited;
|
|
is_validator_withdrawn = validator.withdrawable_epoch < next_epoch;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if is_validator_withdrawn {
|
|
// Deposited balance will never become active. Queue a balance increase but do not
|
|
// consume churn. Validator index must be known if the validator is known to be
|
|
// withdrawn (see calculation of `is_validator_withdrawn` above).
|
|
let validator_index =
|
|
opt_validator_index.ok_or(Error::PendingDepositsLogicError)?;
|
|
validator_deposits_to_process
|
|
.entry(validator_index)
|
|
.or_insert(0)
|
|
.safe_add_assign(deposit.amount)?;
|
|
} else if is_validator_exited {
|
|
// Validator is exiting, postpone the deposit until after withdrawable epoch
|
|
deposits_to_postpone.push(deposit.clone());
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Check if deposit fits in the churn, otherwise, do no more deposit processing in this epoch.
|
|
is_churn_limit_reached =
|
|
processed_amount.safe_add(deposit.amount)? > available_for_processing;
|
|
if is_churn_limit_reached {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
processed_amount.safe_add_assign(deposit.amount)?;
|
|
|
|
// Deposit fits in the churn, process it. Increase balance and consume churn.
|
|
if let Some(validator_index) = state.pubkey_cache().get(&deposit.pubkey) {
|
|
validator_deposits_to_process
|
|
.entry(validator_index)
|
|
.or_insert(0)
|
|
.safe_add_assign(deposit.amount)?;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// The `PendingDeposit` is for a new validator
|
|
new_validator_deposits.push(deposit.clone());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Regardless of how the deposit was handled, we move on in the queue.
|
|
next_deposit_index.safe_add_assign(1)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Accumulate churn only if the churn limit has been hit.
|
|
let deposit_balance_to_consume = if is_churn_limit_reached {
|
|
available_for_processing.safe_sub(processed_amount)?
|
|
} else {
|
|
0
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
Ok(Self {
|
|
next_deposit_index,
|
|
deposit_balance_to_consume,
|
|
validator_deposits_to_process,
|
|
deposits_to_postpone,
|
|
new_validator_deposits,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn process_pending_deposits_for_validator(
|
|
balance: &mut Cow<u64>,
|
|
validator_info: &ValidatorInfo,
|
|
pending_balance_deposits_ctxt: &PendingDepositsContext,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
if let Some(deposit_amount) = pending_balance_deposits_ctxt
|
|
.validator_deposits_to_process
|
|
.get(&validator_info.index)
|
|
{
|
|
balance.make_mut()?.safe_add_assign(*deposit_amount)?;
|
|
}
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Return the set of validators referenced by consolidations, either as source or target.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This function is blind to whether the consolidations are valid and capable of being processed,
|
|
/// it just returns the set of all indices present in consolidations. This is *sufficient* to
|
|
/// make consolidations play nicely with effective balance updates. The algorithm used is:
|
|
///
|
|
/// - In the single pass: apply effective balance updates for all validators *not* referenced by
|
|
/// consolidations.
|
|
/// - Apply consolidations.
|
|
/// - Apply effective balance updates for all validators previously skipped.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Prior to Electra, the empty set is returned.
|
|
fn get_validators_in_consolidations<E: EthSpec>(state: &BeaconState<E>) -> BTreeSet<usize> {
|
|
let mut referenced_validators = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
if let Ok(pending_consolidations) = state.pending_consolidations() {
|
|
for pending_consolidation in pending_consolidations {
|
|
referenced_validators.insert(pending_consolidation.source_index as usize);
|
|
referenced_validators.insert(pending_consolidation.target_index as usize);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
referenced_validators
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// We process pending consolidations after all of single-pass epoch processing, and then patch up
|
|
/// the effective balances for affected validators.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This is safe because processing consolidations does not depend on the `effective_balance`.
|
|
fn process_pending_consolidations<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<E>,
|
|
validators_in_consolidations: &BTreeSet<usize>,
|
|
next_epoch_cache: &mut PreEpochCache,
|
|
effective_balances_ctxt: &EffectiveBalancesContext,
|
|
perform_effective_balance_updates: bool,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
let mut next_pending_consolidation: usize = 0;
|
|
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch()?;
|
|
let pending_consolidations = state.pending_consolidations()?.clone();
|
|
|
|
for pending_consolidation in &pending_consolidations {
|
|
let source_index = pending_consolidation.source_index as usize;
|
|
let target_index = pending_consolidation.target_index as usize;
|
|
let source_validator = state.get_validator(source_index)?;
|
|
if source_validator.slashed {
|
|
next_pending_consolidation.safe_add_assign(1)?;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
if source_validator.withdrawable_epoch > next_epoch {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Calculate the consolidated balance
|
|
let source_effective_balance = std::cmp::min(
|
|
*state
|
|
.balances()
|
|
.get(source_index)
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(source_index))?,
|
|
source_validator.effective_balance,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Move active balance to target. Excess balance is withdrawable.
|
|
decrease_balance(state, source_index, source_effective_balance)?;
|
|
increase_balance(state, target_index, source_effective_balance)?;
|
|
|
|
next_pending_consolidation.safe_add_assign(1)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
state
|
|
.pending_consolidations_mut()?
|
|
.pop_front(next_pending_consolidation)?;
|
|
|
|
// the spec tests require we don't perform effective balance updates when testing pending_consolidations
|
|
if !perform_effective_balance_updates {
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Re-process effective balance updates for validators affected by consolidations.
|
|
let (validators, balances, _, current_epoch_participation, _, progressive_balances, _, _) =
|
|
state.mutable_validator_fields()?;
|
|
for &validator_index in validators_in_consolidations {
|
|
let balance = *balances
|
|
.get(validator_index)
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(validator_index))?;
|
|
let mut validator = validators
|
|
.get_cow(validator_index)
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(validator_index))?;
|
|
let validator_current_epoch_participation = *current_epoch_participation
|
|
.get(validator_index)
|
|
.ok_or(BeaconStateError::UnknownValidator(validator_index))?;
|
|
|
|
process_single_effective_balance_update(
|
|
validator_index,
|
|
balance,
|
|
&mut validator,
|
|
validator_current_epoch_participation,
|
|
next_epoch_cache,
|
|
progressive_balances,
|
|
effective_balances_ctxt,
|
|
state_ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl EffectiveBalancesContext {
|
|
fn new(spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<Self, Error> {
|
|
let hysteresis_increment = spec
|
|
.effective_balance_increment
|
|
.safe_div(spec.hysteresis_quotient)?;
|
|
let downward_threshold =
|
|
hysteresis_increment.safe_mul(spec.hysteresis_downward_multiplier)?;
|
|
let upward_threshold = hysteresis_increment.safe_mul(spec.hysteresis_upward_multiplier)?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(Self {
|
|
downward_threshold,
|
|
upward_threshold,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// This function is called for validators that do not have their effective balance updated as
|
|
/// part of the single-pass loop. For these validators we compute their true effective balance
|
|
/// update after processing consolidations. However, to maintain the invariants of the
|
|
/// `PreEpochCache` we must register _some_ effective balance for them immediately.
|
|
fn process_single_dummy_effective_balance_update(
|
|
validator_index: usize,
|
|
validator: &Cow<Validator>,
|
|
next_epoch_cache: &mut PreEpochCache,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
// Populate the effective balance cache with the current effective balance. This will be
|
|
// overriden when `process_single_effective_balance_update` is called.
|
|
let is_active_next_epoch = validator.is_active_at(state_ctxt.next_epoch);
|
|
let temporary_effective_balance = validator.effective_balance;
|
|
next_epoch_cache.update_effective_balance(
|
|
validator_index,
|
|
temporary_effective_balance,
|
|
is_active_next_epoch,
|
|
)?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// This function abstracts over phase0 and Electra effective balance processing.
|
|
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
|
|
fn process_single_effective_balance_update(
|
|
validator_index: usize,
|
|
balance: u64,
|
|
validator: &mut Cow<Validator>,
|
|
validator_current_epoch_participation: ParticipationFlags,
|
|
next_epoch_cache: &mut PreEpochCache,
|
|
progressive_balances: &mut ProgressiveBalancesCache,
|
|
eb_ctxt: &EffectiveBalancesContext,
|
|
state_ctxt: &StateContext,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
// Use the higher effective balance limit if post-Electra and compounding withdrawal credentials
|
|
// are set.
|
|
let effective_balance_limit = validator.get_max_effective_balance(spec, state_ctxt.fork_name);
|
|
|
|
let old_effective_balance = validator.effective_balance;
|
|
let new_effective_balance = if balance.safe_add(eb_ctxt.downward_threshold)?
|
|
< validator.effective_balance
|
|
|| validator
|
|
.effective_balance
|
|
.safe_add(eb_ctxt.upward_threshold)?
|
|
< balance
|
|
{
|
|
min(
|
|
balance.safe_sub(balance.safe_rem(spec.effective_balance_increment)?)?,
|
|
effective_balance_limit,
|
|
)
|
|
} else {
|
|
validator.effective_balance
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let is_active_next_epoch = validator.is_active_at(state_ctxt.next_epoch);
|
|
|
|
if new_effective_balance != old_effective_balance {
|
|
validator.make_mut()?.effective_balance = new_effective_balance;
|
|
|
|
// Update progressive balances cache for the *current* epoch, which will soon become the
|
|
// previous epoch once the epoch transition completes.
|
|
progressive_balances.on_effective_balance_change(
|
|
validator.slashed,
|
|
validator_current_epoch_participation,
|
|
old_effective_balance,
|
|
new_effective_balance,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Caching: update next epoch effective balances and total active balance.
|
|
next_epoch_cache.update_effective_balance(
|
|
validator_index,
|
|
new_effective_balance,
|
|
is_active_next_epoch,
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|