mirror of
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse.git
synced 2026-03-17 03:42:46 +00:00
Add more testing to proto-array
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1058,11 +1058,20 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find genesis block as root when there is only one block"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 2.
|
||||
// Add block 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// /
|
||||
// 2
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(2), get_hash(0), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the head is 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// /
|
||||
// 2 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1077,12 +1086,20 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find head block with a single chain"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 1 that comes off the genesis block (this is a fork compared
|
||||
// to the previous block).
|
||||
// Add block 1
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(1), get_hash(0), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the head is still 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// head-> 2 1
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1097,11 +1114,24 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find the first block, not the second block (it should compare hashes)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 3 whos parent is hash of 1.
|
||||
// Add block 3
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(3), get_hash(1), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure 3 is the head
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1116,11 +1146,24 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(2) block"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 4 whos parent is hash of 2.
|
||||
// Add block 4
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// 4 3
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(4), get_hash(2), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the head is 4.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// head-> 4 3
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1135,12 +1178,28 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(4) block"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 5 whos parent is hash of 4, where the justified epoch is
|
||||
// higher than others.
|
||||
// Ensure the head is still 4 whilst the justified epoch is 0.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// 4 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 5 <- justified epoch = 1
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(5), get_hash(4), Epoch::new(1), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the head is still 4 whilst the justified epoch is 0.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// head-> 4 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 5
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1155,6 +1214,15 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(4) block because the get_hash(5) should be filtered out"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure there is an error when starting from a block that has the wrong justified epoch.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// 4 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 5 <- starting from 5 with justified epoch 0 should error.
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1168,6 +1236,15 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should not allow finding head from a bad justified epoch"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Set the justified epoch to 1 and the start block to 5 and ensure 5 is the head.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// 4 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 5 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1182,11 +1259,32 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(5) block"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 6 whos parent is hash of 5.
|
||||
// Add block 6
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// 4 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 5
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 6
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(6), get_hash(5), Epoch::new(1), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure 6 is the head
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// | |
|
||||
// 4 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 5
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 6 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1204,7 +1302,7 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn votes() {
|
||||
const VALIDATOR_COUNT: usize = 16;
|
||||
const VALIDATOR_COUNT: usize = 2;
|
||||
let balances = vec![1; VALIDATOR_COUNT];
|
||||
|
||||
let fork_choice = ProtoArrayForkChoice::new(Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0), get_hash(0))
|
||||
@@ -1225,10 +1323,19 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 2.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// /
|
||||
// 2
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(2), get_hash(0), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// /
|
||||
// head-> 2
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1245,10 +1352,19 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 1 that comes off the genesis block (this is a fork compared
|
||||
// to the previous block).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(1), get_hash(0), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// head-> 2 1
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1263,10 +1379,20 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find get_hash(2), not get_hash(1) (it should compare hashes)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a vote to block 1
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1 <- +vote
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_attestation(0, get_hash(1), Epoch::new(1))
|
||||
.expect("should process attestation");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is now 1, beacuse 1 has a vote.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1281,12 +1407,20 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(1) because it now has a vote"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 3 whos parent is hash of 1.
|
||||
// Add a vote to block 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// +vote-> 2 1
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(3), get_hash(1), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
.process_attestation(1, get_hash(2), Epoch::new(1))
|
||||
.expect("should process attestation");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is 2 since 1 and 2 both have a vote
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// head-> 2 1
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1298,14 +1432,128 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(2),
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(2) block"
|
||||
"should find get_hash(2)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 4 whos parent is hash of 2.
|
||||
// Add block 3.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(4), get_hash(2), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(3), get_hash(1), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is still 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// head-> 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
&balances
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(2),
|
||||
"should find get_hash(2)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Move validator #0 vote from 1 to 3
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1 <- -vote
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3 <- +vote
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_attestation(0, get_hash(3), Epoch::new(2))
|
||||
.expect("should process attestation");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is still 2
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// head-> 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
&balances
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(2),
|
||||
"should find get_hash(2)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Move validator #1 vote from 2 to 1 (this is an equivocation, but fork choice doesn't
|
||||
// care)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// -vote-> 2 1 <- +vote
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_attestation(1, get_hash(1), Epoch::new(2))
|
||||
.expect("should process attestation");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is now 3
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
&balances
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(3),
|
||||
"should find get_hash(3)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add block 4.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(4), get_hash(3), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the head is now 4
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1317,15 +1565,35 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(4),
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(4) block"
|
||||
"should find get_hash(4)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 5 whos parent is hash of 4, where the justified epoch is
|
||||
// higher than others.
|
||||
// Add block 5, which has a justified epoch of 1.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4
|
||||
// /
|
||||
// 5 <- justified epoch = 1
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(5), get_hash(4), Epoch::new(1), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that 5 is filtered out and the head stays at 4.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4 <- head
|
||||
// /
|
||||
// 5
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1337,22 +1605,82 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(4),
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(4) block because the get_hash(5) should be filtered out"
|
||||
"should find get_hash(4)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
// Add block 6, which has a justified epoch of 0.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 5 6 <- justified epoch = 0
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(6), get_hash(4), Epoch::new(0), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
// Move both votes to 5.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// +2 vote-> 5 6
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_attestation(0, get_hash(5), Epoch::new(3))
|
||||
.expect("should process attestation");
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_attestation(1, get_hash(5), Epoch::new(3))
|
||||
.expect("should process attestation");
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that 6 is the head, even though 5 has all the votes. This is testing to ensure
|
||||
// that 5 is filtered out due to a differing justified epoch.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 5 6 <- head
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
get_hash(5),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
&balances
|
||||
)
|
||||
.is_err(),
|
||||
"should not allow finding head from a bad justified epoch"
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(6),
|
||||
"should find get_hash(6)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Change fork-choice justified epoch to 1, and the start block to 5 and ensure that 5 is
|
||||
// the head.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// << Change justified epoch to 1 >>
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 0
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// 2 1
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 3
|
||||
// |
|
||||
// 4
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// head -> 5 6
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
@@ -1364,27 +1692,7 @@ mod test_proto_array_fork_choice {
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(5),
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(5) block"
|
||||
"should find get_hash(5)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a block with a hash of 6 whos parent is hash of 5.
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.process_block(get_hash(6), get_hash(5), Epoch::new(1), Epoch::new(0))
|
||||
.expect("should process block");
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
fork_choice
|
||||
.find_head(
|
||||
Epoch::new(1),
|
||||
get_hash(5),
|
||||
Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
Hash256::zero(),
|
||||
&balances
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("should find head"),
|
||||
get_hash(6),
|
||||
"should find the get_hash(6) block"
|
||||
);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user